@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Mazda CX-60 vs MG HS/EHS – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or MG HS/EHS fits your lifestyle better.

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

MG HS/EHS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG HS/EHS has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 17914 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 1.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

As for range, the MG HS/EHS performs noticeable better – achieving up to 100 km, about 36 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a somewhat edge – offering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the MG HS/EHS takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs a bit better – reaching 219 km/h, while the MG HS/EHS tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls distinct stronger with 550 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG HS/EHS is somewhat lighter – 1625 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more room – 570 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 63 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs a bit better – up to 1726 L, which is about 242 L more than the MG HS/EHS.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 evident takes the win – 612 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 212 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG HS/EHS proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG HS/EHS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Mazda CX-60
MG HS/EHS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £24,000
default

MG HS/EHS

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 7.6 L
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

MG HS/EHS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews MG HS/EHS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a …
Mazda CX-60
MG HS/EHS
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4655 - 4670 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1484 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 195 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1496 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
MG

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
When comparing the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-60, enthusiasts will find a compelling battle between sporty performance and refined practicality. The Terramar stands out with its aggressive design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who crave adrenaline on the road. In contrast, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the burgeoning compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinct blends of style and utility. While the CX-60 offers a more upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, the RAV4 excels in practicality and fuel efficiency, making it a top choice for families. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
ZEEKR 7X
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and ZEEKR 7X compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
MG HS/EHS
VS
Nissan Qashqai and MG HS/EHS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
Lynk & Co 01
MG HS/EHS
VS
Lynk & Co 01 and MG HS/EHS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click