VS

Mazda CX-60 vs MINI Aceman comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or MINI Aceman?

Mazda CX-60 vs MINI Aceman: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MINI Aceman is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,671 £.

As for electric range, the MINI Aceman offers considerably more range – reaching up to 355 km, about 292 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Aceman

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is very slightly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more boot space – 570 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 270 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries moderately more – 612 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
Mazda CX-60
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
Mazda CX-60
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
450 - 530 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
MINI
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.