VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mitsubishi Colt – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Mitsubishi Colt fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Colt has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18200 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 23743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Colt with 4.20 L. The difference is about 2.80 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a significantly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.30 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs distinct better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 45 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls convincingly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 390 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is convincingly lighter – 1189 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 701 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers distinct more room – 570 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 179 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs noticeable better – up to 1726 L, which is about 657 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 clearly perceptible takes the win – 612 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 227 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £41,900
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact hatchback that combines practicality with a sleek design, making it an appealing choice for city drivers. Its efficient engine offers a balance of performance and fuel economy, which is ideal for everyday commuting. Inside, the Colt provides a comfortable cabin with intuitive controls and ample boot space for its class.

details

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-60
Mitsubishi Colt
CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
18200 - 25000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1189 - 1380 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4053 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1798 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1439 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2023 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a solid choice for larger families. Ultimately, the decision between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value in their respective categories.
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
Mazda CX-60
Genesis GV70
VS
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these models comes down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value and reliability in their own right.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 shines with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, offering a sportier alternative to the more minimalist Volvo XC40. While the XC40 impresses with its robust safety features and premium interior materials, the CX-60 caters to those seeking a more connected driving experience paired with versatile cargo space. Ultimately, the choice between these two sophisticated vehicles depends on whether you prioritize driving pleasure or a refined, tech-savvy cabin.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.