Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mitsubishi Space Star?
Mazda CX-60 vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,023 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
Space Star
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 256 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 8.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 448 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 950 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more boot space – 570 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 335 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries visibly more – 612 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 212 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Mazda CX-60
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.