What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on the version, the Mazda CX-60 delivers up to 327 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Mazda CX-60 in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 1.40 L.

What is the Mazda CX-60’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 64 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-60 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on configuration, up to 570 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-60 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-60 is 4745 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1680 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Renault Arkana?

Up to 143 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Renault Arkana use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.70 L.

How many kWh does the Renault Arkana’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 0.60 kWh.

What are the Renault Arkana’s length, width and height?

Length 4568 mm, width 1821 mm, height 1576 mm – those are the dimensions of the Renault Arkana.

Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 13448 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a significantly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 5 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 47 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls significantly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 345 Nm difference.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Arkana is noticeable lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 380 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers a bit more room – 570 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs distinct better – up to 1726 L, which is about 463 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 161 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Renault Arkana

Renault Symbioz

VS

The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …

Mazda CX-60

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …

Costs and Consumption
Price 41900 - 56800 £	Price 28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km 1.4 - 5.4 L	Consumption L/100km 4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 64 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 0.60 kWh
co2 31 - 139 g/km	co2 106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 - 58 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1890 - 2055 kg	Curb weight 1510 kg
Trunk capacity 570 L	Trunk capacity 480 L
Length 4745 mm	Length 4568 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1821 mm
Height 1680 - 1688 mm	Height 1576 mm
Max trunk capacity 1726 L	Max trunk capacity 1263 L
Payload 581 - 612 kg	Payload 451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 200 - 327 HP	Power HP 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.80 s
Max Speed 200 - 219 km/h	Max Speed 172 km/h
Torque 450 - 550 Nm	Torque 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 147 - 241 kW	Power kW 105 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 1598 cm3