Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Volvo S60?
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo S60 is barely cheaper – starting at 42,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,157 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo S60 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 94 km, about 31 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers clearly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is slightly lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers visibly more boot space – 570 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries visibly more – 612 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 137 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Mazda CX-60
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Mazda CX-60
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.