VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo S60 – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-60 meets Volvo S60.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Volvo S60 costs 42500 £. That’s a price difference of around 609 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo S60 manages with 0.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 1.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Volvo S60 performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 94 km, about 30 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

S60 @ media.volvocars.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo S60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo S60 pulls evident stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo S60 is to a small extent lighter – 1715 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly perceptible more room – 570 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 distinct takes the win – 612 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 137 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo S60 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £42,500
239391_New_Volvo_S60_R-Design_exterior

Volvo S60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 197 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.7 - 7.1 L
  • Electric Range : 94 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Volvo S60

The Volvo S60 combines sleek Scandinavian design with a focus on comfort and performance, offering a refined driving experience. Its interior is meticulously crafted, featuring high-quality materials and cutting-edge technology to enhance the journey for both driver and passengers. Safety remains a hallmark of the brand, with the S60 incorporating advanced systems designed to protect and assist on the road.

details
239391_New_Volvo_S60_R-Design_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
239392_New_Volvo_S60_R-Design_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
294031_S60_Recharge_Google_built-in @ media.volvocars.com
294032_S60_Recharge_T8_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo S60
CX-60
S60

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
42500 - 65100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
94 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
16 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
60 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1715 - 2039 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4778 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1850 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1431 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
461 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2022 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a solid choice for larger families. Ultimately, the decision between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value in their respective categories.
Mazda CX-60
Genesis GV70
VS
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these models comes down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value and reliability in their own right.
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the burgeoning compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinct blends of style and utility. While the CX-60 offers a more upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, the RAV4 excels in practicality and fuel efficiency, making it a top choice for families. Ultimately, the decision between these two popular models will hinge on individual preferences for performance versus everyday functionality.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.