Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo S90 comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 62,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Volvo S90?
Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo S90: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-60 is significantly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Volvo S90 costs 62,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,557 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S90 uses 0.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo S90 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 89 km, about 26 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
S90
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S90 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S90 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.7 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S90 delivers visibly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is very slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,912 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers noticeably more boot space – 570 L compared to 453 L. That’s a difference of about 117 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries somewhat more – 612 kg compared to 518 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S90 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £62,200
Volvo S90
Mazda CX-60
Volvo S90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Volvo S90
The Volvo S90 is a composed, elegant luxury sedan that dresses Scandinavian restraint in a quietly imposing package. It prioritises serene highway manners and a calm, tech‑savvy cabin, making it a car that suggests you deserve the nicer things in life without ever raising its voice.
details
Mazda CX-60
Volvo S90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
62,200 - 70,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
89 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
17 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,912 - 2,119 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
431 - 453 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,969 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,440 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
451 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
235 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
173 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.