VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 62,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • noticeably cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
details

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

  • moderately more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 62,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,643 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 2 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.

Range Rover Velar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers moderately more power – delivering 404 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar delivers moderately more torque with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is very slightly lighter – 2,003 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries only slightly more – 650 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.

details
6.RR_Velar_21MY_Onroad_230920
9.RR_Velar_21MY_Onroad_230920
3.RR_Velar_21MY_Static_230920
RR_Velar_21MY_D300_R-Dynamic_Interior_001

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Velar

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mercedes GLC
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
When comparing the Mercedes GLC to the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, both vehicles offer a luxurious SUV experience, but cater to slightly different preferences. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its refined interior and cutting-edge technology, appealing to those who value comfort and connectivity. …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Land Rover Defender
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
The Land Rover Defender and Land Rover Range Rover Velar compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BMW X5
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW X5 offers a blend of performance and opulence with its powerful engine options, refined interior, and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the new Mazda CX-80 presents a compelling alternative, delivering a spacious yet elegant cabin and Mazda's signature …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
62,000 - 87,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 10 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
58 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
103 - 228 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,003 - 2,280 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,933 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
460 - 587 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 - 2,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C, F
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.