@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-80 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £. That’s a price difference of around 13671 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.20 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 63 km, about 2 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Range Rover Velar @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a somewhat edge – offering 404 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs a bit better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-80 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls a bit stronger with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is slight lighter – 2003 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers significantly more room – 552 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 294 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1971 L, which is about 613 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 barely noticeable takes the win – 650 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.

details
6.RR_Velar_21MY_Onroad_230920 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
9.RR_Velar_21MY_Onroad_230920 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
3.RR_Velar_21MY_Static_230920 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
RR_Velar_21MY_D300_R-Dynamic_Interior_001 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X3
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
When comparing the BMW X3 and the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, each SUV offers its own unique appeal to discerning drivers. The BMW X3 shines with its engaging handling and efficient powertrain, making it a joy for those who appreciate a spirited drive. Meanwhile, the Range Rover Velar stands out …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Range Rover Velar @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Price
61900 - 87400 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
61 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
co2
35 - 151 g/km
co2
110 - 232 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4797 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1933 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
460 - 587 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Land Rover Range Rover Velar go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 present compelling options for those seeking a versatile SUV. The CR-V stands out with its robust reliability and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 offers a sportier driving experience with …
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Grand Cherokee
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
Unsure whether the Jeep Grand Cherokee or the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Kia Corporation
Kia EV9
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Kia EV9 and Mazda CX-80 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.