VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mitsubishi ASX?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mitsubishi ASX: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,566 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 169 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers substantially more torque with 550 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is clearly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 835 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers clearly more boot space – 484 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 226 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 205 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Mazda CX-80
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mitsubishi ASX
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
Comparing the Mitsubishi ASX and the Mitsubishi Grandis helps you decide whether you need a compact crossover that’s easy in town or a roomy MPV designed for family duty. I’ll point out the key differences in space, driving character, fuel economy and running costs so you can quickly see which fits …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Mitsubishi ASX and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward, durable value and simple packaging (ASX) or a more stylish, configurable small SUV with clever cabin packaging and tech (Captur). I’ll quickly compare how they stack up for space, …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mitsubishi ASX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi ASX stands out with its robust design and practicality, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. In contrast, the Toyota Yaris Cross combines sporty aesthetics with impressive fuel efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers …
Kia Sportage
Mitsubishi ASX
VS
Kia Sportage and Mitsubishi ASX go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Sportage or the …
Mitsubishi ASX
Subaru Forester
VS
Mitsubishi ASX and Subaru Forester go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mitsubishi ASX or …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Mazda CX-80
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
99 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.