VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Vauxhall Astra comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 196 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 28,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Vauxhall Astra?

Mazda CX-80 vs Vauxhall Astra: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Vauxhall Astra

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • substantially lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Vauxhall Astra is significantly cheaper – starting at 28,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,051 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Astra uses 2.2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Vauxhall Astra offers substantially more range – reaching up to 454 km, about 394 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Astra

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 196 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Vauxhall Astra takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Astra is substantially lighter – 1,438 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 693 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Vauxhall Astra offers clearly more boot space – 422 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries markedly more – 650 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 148 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Astra is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,300
Astra

Vauxhall Astra

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 130 - 196 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.2 - 4.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 84 - 454 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Opel Astra
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Astra is the grown-up compact — practical, composed and roomy enough for weekend gear, while the Opel Mokka trades boot space for a higher driving position, sharper looks and crossover sass. Pick the Astra for better value, comfort and lower running costs; choose the Mokka if you crave …
Ford Puma
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Vauxhall Astra comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with a sporty, raised stance or a more conventional family hatch with roomy practicality. The Puma brings a higher driving position and clever cargo solutions, while the Astra focuses on space, …
Mazda CX-80
Vauxhall Astra

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Vauxhall Astra

The Opel Astra strikes a neat balance between everyday practicality and engaging handling, so the daily grind suddenly feels a bit less dull. Inside it's intelligently packaged with modern kit and comfortable seating, making it a very sensible pick for buyers who want a dependable hatchback that doesn't take itself too seriously.

details
01_Opel-Astra-518263
05_Opel-Astra-518267
24_Opel-Astra-518297

Reviews Vauxhall Astra

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Citroen C4
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C4 and the Opel Astra comes down to whether you value distinctive, comfort-focused design or practical, driver-oriented all-round ability. I’ll compare fuel economy, interior space, technology and driving dynamics so you can quickly see which one matches your priorities.
Opel Astra
Opel Corsa
VS
In an exciting head-to-head matchup, the Opel Astra and Opel Corsa showcase their unique strengths in the compact car segment. The Astra impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, making it a perfect choice for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the more compact …
Opel Astra
VW Polo
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Opel Astra and VW Polo, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths, appealing to a diverse range of drivers. The Astra impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology features, making it a strong contender in the compact car segment. Meanwhile, …
Opel Astra
Opel Frontera
VS
When comparing the Vauxhall Astra to the Vauxhall Frontera, drivers will find distinct differences catering to varying needs. The Astra, known for its nimble handling and fuel efficiency, is ideal for urban commuters and those prioritizing economy. On the other hand, the Frontera offers robust …
Mazda CX-80
Vauxhall Astra

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
28,300 - 37,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.2 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
84 - 454 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 130 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,438 - 1,733 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
310 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
438 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
130 - 196 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, D, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Vauxhall
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.