VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot Partner comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 26,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Peugeot Partner?

Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot Partner: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Peugeot Partner

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot Partner is significantly cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,216 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Peugeot Partner with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot Partner offers clearly more range – reaching up to 354 km, about 294 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Partner

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 191 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Peugeot Partner takes 11.2 s. That’s about 4.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Partner is clearly lighter – 1,371 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 760 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Partner carries somewhat more – 781 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 131 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot Partner
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Peugeot Partner and the Peugeot Rifter are closely related but aimed at different buyers: the Partner is a practical small van focused on load-carrying and work use, while the Rifter is the more passenger-oriented, lifestyle MPV version. I’ll compare their space, comfort, driving character and …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot Partner

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Peugeot Partner

The Peugeot Partner is a no-nonsense workhorse that doubles as a surprisingly comfy family mover, combining clever storage solutions with an easy-to-live-in cabin. It won’t win any beauty contests, but for small businesses and active families it’s practical, economical and utterly reliable when the day gets busy.

details
PEUGEOT_PARTNER_PRO-SKILL_2509CGI_201_FR
PEUGEOT_PARTNER_PRO-SKILL_2509CGI_200_FR
PEUGEOT_PAR_2310GJ_303

Reviews Peugeot Partner

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot Partner
Toyota Proace City
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot Partner and the Toyota Proace City comes down to whether you prioritise clever interior packaging and comfort (Partner) or straightforward reliability, simplicity and low running costs (Proace City). This short comparison will focus on load space, practicality, fuel …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Peugeot Partner
Renault Kangoo
VS
In a clash of practicality versus flair, the Peugeot E-Partner Socio and the Renault Kangoo showcase distinct personalities tailored for diverse needs. The Socio, renowned for its innovative approach and stylish design, offers a comfortable ride with ample tech-savvy features that appeal to urban …
Opel Combo
Peugeot Partner
VS
The Vauxhall Combo and Peugeot Partner are closely related small vans that share the same platform and many mechanicals, but they present different strengths in styling, trim and dealer support. This comparison will show where each model wins on practicality, comfort, running costs and value so you …
Peugeot Partner
VW Caddy
VS
In the compact van segment, the Peugeot Socio stands out with its sleek design and advanced tech features, challenging the robust and reliable VW Caddy. While the Socio offers a more stylish interior and efficient engine options, the Caddy excels with greater cargo capacity and a proven track …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Ford Transit Courier
Peugeot Partner
VS
The Ford Transit Courier and Peugeot Partner compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Citroen Berlingo
Peugeot Partner
VS
The Citroen Berlingo and Peugeot Partner compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot Partner

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
26,100 - 33,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
354 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
7
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,371 - 1,674 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
645 - 781 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.