Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot Rifter comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 22,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Peugeot Rifter?
Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot Rifter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Peugeot Rifter is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,468 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
Rifter
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 197 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 11.3 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers substantially more torque with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Rifter is significantly lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 633 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers substantially more boot space – 1,050 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 792 L.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries clearly more – 814 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 164 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot Rifter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Peugeot Rifter
The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.
details
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot Rifter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
22,900 - 30,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
142 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,694 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
322 - 1,050 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
518 - 814 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.