Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Superb Limousine comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Skoda Superb Limousine?
Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Superb Limousine: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Superb Limousine is significantly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,271 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Limousine uses 1.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers considerably more range – reaching up to 140 km, about 80 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Superb Limousine
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers a bit more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Limousine is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.6 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers markedly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Limousine is visibly lighter – 1,559 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 572 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers substantially more boot space – 645 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 387 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries slightly more – 650 kg compared to 580 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Limousine stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £35,100
Skoda Superb Limousine
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Superb Limousine
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Skoda Superb Limousine
The Skoda Superb is the quietly imposing saloon that turns everyday practicality into tasteful luxury, with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and a boot that swallows groceries and luggage with military discipline. For buyers who want executive presence without the badge snobbery, it’s a clever, polished choice that rewards sensible thinking with genuine comfort and pragmatic charm.
details
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Superb Limousine
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
35,100 - 52,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
131 - 140 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
26 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,559 - 1,896 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
486 - 645 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
441 - 580 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.