VS

Mazda CX-80 vs smart #3 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or smart #3?

Mazda CX-80 vs smart #3: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
details

smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

smart #3 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 42,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,337 £.

As for electric range, the smart #3 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 395 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

#3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers visibly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 384 Nm. That’s about 166 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 321 kg.

Looking at boot space, the smart #3 offers visibly more boot space – 370 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries markedly more – 650 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The smart #3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£41,991
#3

smart #3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 455 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
smart #3
smart #5
VS
smart #3 and smart #5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the smart #3 or the smart #5 is the …
Mazda CX-80
smart #3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

smart #3

The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.

details
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca1
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca13
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca21
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-interior-mallorca10
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-interior-mallorca3
smart-hashtag3-premium-ceramic-cream-interior-mallorca7

Reviews smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ronny
16 Oct 2025, 13:10:59

Handsome design, packed with advanced driver‑assist technology and stellar performance — all at an attractive price. Highly recommended, this car!

Frequently compared as well

smart #1
smart #3
VS
smart #1 and smart #3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the smart #1 or the smart #3 is the …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
smart #3
Volvo EX40
VS
smart #3 and Volvo EX40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the smart #3 or the Volvo EX40 is …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
smart #3

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
42,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
455 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,810 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
370 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,844 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
450 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
384 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
smart
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.