Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota RAV4 – Which car suits you better?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-80 or Toyota RAV4?
CX-80
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota RAV4 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35100 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 13080 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota RAV4 manages with 1 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Toyota RAV4 performs a bit better – achieving up to 75 km, about 14 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
RAV4
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota RAV4 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Toyota RAV4 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
CX-80
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Toyota RAV4 is noticeable lighter – 1745 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 386 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Toyota RAV4 offers convincingly more room – 580 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 322 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs a bit better – up to 1971 L, which is about 281 L more than the Toyota RAV4.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 slight takes the win – 650 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Toyota RAV4 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £35,100
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
The Toyota RAV4 feels like a sensible friend on the road, marrying dependable practicality with a dash of SUV personality that keeps daily driving from turning dull. Comfortable and easy to live with, it looks tough without shouting and quietly gets the job done — a sensible pick for buyers who want versatility without drama.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
Toyota RAV4
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48200 - 60200 £
|
Price
35100 - 55700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1 - 5.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
61 km
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 151 g/km
|
co2
22 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
Curb weight
1745 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 580 L
|
|
Length
4995 mm
|
Length
4600 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1855 mm
|
|
Height
1714 mm
|
Height
1685 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1604 - 1690 L
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
390 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
218 - 306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
160 - 225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2487 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?
The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.