VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo V60 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-80 or Volvo V60?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo V60 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41600 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 6566 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo V60 with 2.40 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Volvo V60 performs distinct better – achieving up to 92 km, about 31 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

V60 @ media.volvocars.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo V60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo V60 pulls distinct stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.

CX-80 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Volvo V60 is evident lighter – 1734 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 397 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo V60 offers decisively more room – 519 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 261 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1971 L, which is about 540 L more than the Volvo V60.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 noticeable takes the win – 650 kg compared to 506 kg. That’s a difference of about 144 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 shows itself to be wins solidly and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £48,200
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ newsroom.mazda.com
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ newsroom.mazda.com
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ newsroom.mazda.com

Volvo V60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo V60 exudes a sense of refined elegance with its sleek design and smooth contours, making it a standout in the estate car category. Inside, it offers a harmonious blend of luxury and functionality with premium materials and state-of-the-art technology, ensuring a comfortable driving experience. Its performance on the road is impressive, combining efficient handling with a powerful yet quiet ride, making it a favourite for those who appreciate both style and substance.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden @ media.volvocars.com
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a higher driving position and ample space, making it the ideal choice for those seeking versatility without compromising on elegance.
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference in style versus functionality, as both models cater to the needs of modern families.
Mazda CX-80
Volvo V60
CX-80
V60

Costs and Consumption
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Price
41600 - 64200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 6.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
61 km
Electric Range
92 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
35 - 151 g/km
co2
54 - 140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
60 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
1734 - 2064 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4778 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1850 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1432 mm
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Max trunk capacity
1431 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
466 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Audi A5 Avant
Volvo V60
VS
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. Ultimately, both vehicles deliver strong performance, making the choice lean heavily on personal style and desired driving experience.
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake
Volvo V60
VS
In the battle of stylish practicality, the Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake and Volvo V60 present two distinct philosophies for discerning drivers. The CLA impresses with its sleek design and sporty driving dynamics, making it a standout for those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. In contrast, the Volvo V60 offers a more spacious interior and a strong emphasis on safety and comfort, appealing to families and those seeking a more laid-back driving experience.
Toyota RAV4
Volvo V60
VS
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive choice for families. Ultimately, the decision between the two may hinge on personal preference for sportiness versus practicality, but both models deliver solid performance in their respective strengths.
Skoda Octavia Combi
Volvo V60
VS
Volvo V60
Volvo XC40
VS
In the latest showdown between Volvo's stylish offerings, the V60 and the XC40, each vehicle brings a distinct set of attributes to the table. The V60, with its sleek wagon design, caters to those seeking a spacious and comfortable ride without compromising on elegant aesthetics, perfect for long road trips with the family. On the other hand, the XC40 stands out as a compact SUV, ideal for urban adventurers who value elevated seating and modern tech features, offering a practical yet chic choice for everyday commutes.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting families and those who value extra room for passengers or cargo. Both models share Mazda's renowned driving dynamics and sleek design language, offering buyers a choice between agility and spaciousness without compromising on quality or performance.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.