Mazda VS Volvo

VS

In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 emphasizes safety and a refined interior, offering an advanced suite of technology and comfort features for families and discerning drivers alike.

Mazda

details

Volvo

details

The automotive landscape is evolving rapidly, with consumer preferences shifting towards SUVs that embody both luxury and practicality. In this comprehensive comparison, we take a closer look at two remarkable contenders: the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60. Both vehicles offer unique features, state-of-the-art technologies, and impressive performance metrics, making them prime examples of modern automotive engineering.

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-80 is a larger SUV, measuring 4995 mm in length and 1890 mm in width, which translates to a more spacious interior, capable of accommodating up to seven passengers. Its bold and elegant design language reflects Mazda's Kodo design philosophy, making it a head-turner on the road.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 presents a more compact profile, with a length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm, ideal for urban environments while still exuding an air of sophistication. Though it seats five, the XC60’s premium materials and minimalist Scandinavian design make it a luxury unto itself.

Engine Options and Performance

Both vehicles come equipped with advanced powertrains that promise exceptional performance and efficiency. The Mazda CX-80 offers two engine options, including a robust 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV, allowing for a maximum torque of 550 Nm. The CX-80 has an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 6.8 seconds combined with an electric range of 60 km, making it both powerful and economical.

In comparison, the Volvo XC60 presents a wider power range with options peaking at 455 HP. The standout performance is from its higher-end Plug-in Hybrid version that achieves 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. With a maximum torque of 709 Nm and an electric range of 80 km, the XC60 provides a thrilling driving experience while maintaining efficiency.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is paramount in today’s automotive market, and both models offer commendable figures. The Mazda CX-80 consumes an impressive 1.6 L/100 km in its hybrid variant while the Diesel MHEV variant shows a consumption of 5.7 L/100 km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the CX-80 performs admirably with a class B rating, releasing just 35 g/km in the hybrid variant.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60, while not matching the CX-80’s electric efficiency, manages a respectable fuel consumption of 7.7 L/100 km in its gasoline variant, with CO2 emissions varying per model but reaching as low as 22 g/km for the hybrid variant. This puts the XC60 in a favorable light for eco-conscious consumers.

Interior and Technology Features

Inside, the Mazda CX-80 boasts a spacious cabin with cutting-edge technology. It offers a host of driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and advanced infotainment systems that enhance the driving experience. The option of seven seats makes it a practical choice for families.

Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 emphasizes luxury and comfort, featuring premium materials and an intuitive infotainment system that is the hallmark of the Scandinavian brand. With a comfortable layout and seating for five, it focuses on creating a serene driving environment, supplemented by advanced safety features like Pilot Assist and a robust suite of the latest driver support technologies.

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs. The CX-80 stands out with its larger size and hybrid efficiency, making it a favorite for families seeking comfort and space. In contrast, the XC60 makes a strong case with its exhilarating performance and luxurious touches, perfect for those looking to combine practicality with a premium experience.

Both vehicles showcase the remarkable advancements in the SUV segment and highlight the unique strengths of their respective brands. Whichever choice you make, you’ll be driving away in a vehicle that reflects the future of driving excellence.

Mazda
Volvo

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 47400 - 59400 £
Price
about 48800 - 74600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.7 L
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 7.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
79 - 80 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
co2
35 - 148 g/km
co2
22 - 174 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4688 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1658 mm
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Top speed
195 - 219 km/h
Top speed
180 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.