@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Volvo Cars

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo XC60 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 1.60 L.

Q: What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 61 km.

Q: How fast can the Mazda CX-80 go?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches up to 219 km/h.

Q: How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

Q: How big is the Mazda CX-80 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 is 4995 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1714 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

The Volvo XC60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Volvo XC60?

Up to 455 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC60 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 2.80 L.

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-80 or Volvo XC60 fits your lifestyle better.

scroll down

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

The automotive landscape is evolving rapidly, with consumer preferences shifting towards SUVs that embody both luxury and practicality. In this comprehensive comparison, we take a closer look at two remarkable contenders: the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60. Both vehicles offer unique features, state-of-the-art technologies, and impressive performance metrics, making them prime examples of modern automotive engineering.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-80 is a larger SUV, measuring 4995 mm in length and 1890 mm in width, which translates to a more spacious interior, capable of accommodating up to seven passengers. Its bold and elegant design language reflects Mazda's Kodo design philosophy, making it a head-turner on the road.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 presents a more compact profile, with a length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm, ideal for urban environments while still exuding an air of sophistication. Though it seats five, the XC60’s premium materials and minimalist Scandinavian design make it a luxury unto itself.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine Options and Performance

Both vehicles come equipped with advanced powertrains that promise exceptional performance and efficiency. The Mazda CX-80 offers two engine options, including a robust 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV, allowing for a maximum torque of 550 Nm. The CX-80 has an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 6.8 seconds combined with an electric range of 60 km, making it both powerful and economical.

In comparison, the Volvo XC60 presents a wider power range with options peaking at 455 HP. The standout performance is from its higher-end Plug-in Hybrid version that achieves 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. With a maximum torque of 709 Nm and an electric range of 80 km, the XC60 provides a thrilling driving experience while maintaining efficiency.

scroll down

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is paramount in today’s automotive market, and both models offer commendable figures. The Mazda CX-80 consumes an impressive 1.6 L/100 km in its hybrid variant while the Diesel MHEV variant shows a consumption of 5.7 L/100 km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the CX-80 performs admirably with a class B rating, releasing just 35 g/km in the hybrid variant.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60, while not matching the CX-80’s electric efficiency, manages a respectable fuel consumption of 7.7 L/100 km in its gasoline variant, with CO2 emissions varying per model but reaching as low as 22 g/km for the hybrid variant. This puts the XC60 in a favorable light for eco-conscious consumers.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Interior and Technology Features

Inside, the Mazda CX-80 boasts a spacious cabin with cutting-edge technology. It offers a host of driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and advanced infotainment systems that enhance the driving experience. The option of seven seats makes it a practical choice for families.

Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 emphasizes luxury and comfort, featuring premium materials and an intuitive infotainment system that is the hallmark of the Scandinavian brand. With a comfortable layout and seating for five, it focuses on creating a serene driving environment, supplemented by advanced safety features like Pilot Assist and a robust suite of the latest driver support technologies.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs. The CX-80 stands out with its larger size and hybrid efficiency, making it a favorite for families seeking comfort and space. In contrast, the XC60 makes a strong case with its exhilarating performance and luxurious touches, perfect for those looking to combine practicality with a premium experience.

Both vehicles showcase the remarkable advancements in the SUV segment and highlight the unique strengths of their respective brands. Whichever choice you make, you’ll be driving away in a vehicle that reflects the future of driving excellence.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 977 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Volvo XC60 performs distinct better – achieving up to 82 km, about 21 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs slightly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls noticeable stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is a bit lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 231 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers decisively more room – 483 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 225 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1971 L, which is about 428 L more than the Volvo XC60.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 somewhat takes the win – 650 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

Price : 48200 - 60200 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
Electric Range : 61 km
Seats : 7
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 6.8 - 8.4 s
Model Year : 2024
Max Speed : 195 - 219 km/h
Torque : 500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 4 - 6
Doors : 5
Model : CX-80
Modell : CX-80 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV, CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D 254
CO2 Efficiency Class : B, E
Trim Level : Exclusive-Line AWD Automatik, Homura AWD Automatik, Homura Plus AWD Automatik, Takumi AWD Automatik, Takumi Plus AWD Automatik
Power kW : 187 - 241 kW
co2 : 35 - 151 g/km
Engine capacity : 2488 - 3283 cm3
Curb weight : 2131 - 2240 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 70 - 74 L
Trunk capacity : 258 L
Length : 4995 mm
Width : 1890 mm
Height : 1714 mm
Brand : Mazda
Max trunk capacity : 1971 L
Payload : 649 - 650 kg

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Volvo XC60

5 (1)

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details

288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey

@ Volvo Cars

288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey

@ Volvo Cars

288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey

@ Volvo Cars

@ Volvo Cars

288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

@ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Tayron

In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga

@ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …

Mazda CX-80

Volvo XC60

@ Mazda Motor Corporation	@ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price 48200 - 60200 £	Price 49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 5.8 L	Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 61 km	Electric Range 74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 14.70 kWh
co2 35 - 151 g/km	co2 64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 70 - 74 L	Fuel tank capacity 71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 7	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg	Curb weight 1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity 258 L	Trunk capacity 468 - 483 L
Length 4995 mm	Length 4708 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1902 mm
Height 1714 mm	Height 1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity 1971 L	Max trunk capacity 1528 - 1543 L
Payload 649 - 650 kg	Payload 510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 254 - 327 HP	Power HP 250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed 195 - 219 km/h	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 500 - 550 Nm	Torque 350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 187 - 241 kW	Power kW 184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 1969 cm3