Compare performance (327 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Volvo XC60?
The automotive landscape is evolving rapidly, with consumer preferences shifting towards SUVs that embody both luxury and practicality. In this comprehensive comparison, we take a closer look at two remarkable contenders: the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60. Both vehicles offer unique features, state-of-the-art technologies, and impressive performance metrics, making them prime examples of modern automotive engineering.
The Mazda CX-80 is a larger SUV, measuring 4995 mm in length and 1890 mm in width, which translates to a more spacious interior, capable of accommodating up to seven passengers. Its bold and elegant design language reflects Mazda's Kodo design philosophy, making it a head-turner on the road.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 presents a more compact profile, with a length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm, ideal for urban environments while still exuding an air of sophistication. Though it seats five, the XC60’s premium materials and minimalist Scandinavian design make it a luxury unto itself.
Both vehicles come equipped with advanced powertrains that promise exceptional performance and efficiency. The Mazda CX-80 offers two engine options, including a robust 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV, allowing for a maximum torque of 550 Nm. The CX-80 has an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 6.8 seconds combined with an electric range of 60 km, making it both powerful and economical.
In comparison, the Volvo XC60 presents a wider power range with options peaking at 455 HP. The standout performance is from its higher-end Plug-in Hybrid version that achieves 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. With a maximum torque of 709 Nm and an electric range of 80 km, the XC60 provides a thrilling driving experience while maintaining efficiency.
Fuel efficiency is paramount in today’s automotive market, and both models offer commendable figures. The Mazda CX-80 consumes an impressive 1.6 L/100 km in its hybrid variant while the Diesel MHEV variant shows a consumption of 5.7 L/100 km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the CX-80 performs admirably with a class B rating, releasing just 35 g/km in the hybrid variant.
In contrast, the Volvo XC60, while not matching the CX-80’s electric efficiency, manages a respectable fuel consumption of 7.7 L/100 km in its gasoline variant, with CO2 emissions varying per model but reaching as low as 22 g/km for the hybrid variant. This puts the XC60 in a favorable light for eco-conscious consumers.
Inside, the Mazda CX-80 boasts a spacious cabin with cutting-edge technology. It offers a host of driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and advanced infotainment systems that enhance the driving experience. The option of seven seats makes it a practical choice for families.
Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 emphasizes luxury and comfort, featuring premium materials and an intuitive infotainment system that is the hallmark of the Scandinavian brand. With a comfortable layout and seating for five, it focuses on creating a serene driving environment, supplemented by advanced safety features like Pilot Assist and a robust suite of the latest driver support technologies.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs. The CX-80 stands out with its larger size and hybrid efficiency, making it a favorite for families seeking comfort and space. In contrast, the XC60 makes a strong case with its exhilarating performance and luxurious touches, perfect for those looking to combine practicality with a premium experience.
Both vehicles showcase the remarkable advancements in the SUV segment and highlight the unique strengths of their respective brands. Whichever choice you make, you’ll be driving away in a vehicle that reflects the future of driving excellence.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-80 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,949 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 79 km, about 19 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers slightly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers moderately more torque with 669 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 119 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is very slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 19 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 140 kg.
The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
59 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España