In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 emphasizes safety and a refined interior, offering an advanced suite of technology and comfort features for families and discerning drivers alike.
The automotive landscape is evolving rapidly, with consumer preferences shifting towards SUVs that embody both luxury and practicality. In this comprehensive comparison, we take a closer look at two remarkable contenders: the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60. Both vehicles offer unique features, state-of-the-art technologies, and impressive performance metrics, making them prime examples of modern automotive engineering.
The Mazda CX-80 is a larger SUV, measuring 4995 mm in length and 1890 mm in width, which translates to a more spacious interior, capable of accommodating up to seven passengers. Its bold and elegant design language reflects Mazda's Kodo design philosophy, making it a head-turner on the road.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 presents a more compact profile, with a length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm, ideal for urban environments while still exuding an air of sophistication. Though it seats five, the XC60’s premium materials and minimalist Scandinavian design make it a luxury unto itself.
Both vehicles come equipped with advanced powertrains that promise exceptional performance and efficiency. The Mazda CX-80 offers two engine options, including a robust 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV, allowing for a maximum torque of 550 Nm. The CX-80 has an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 6.8 seconds combined with an electric range of 60 km, making it both powerful and economical.
In comparison, the Volvo XC60 presents a wider power range with options peaking at 455 HP. The standout performance is from its higher-end Plug-in Hybrid version that achieves 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. With a maximum torque of 709 Nm and an electric range of 80 km, the XC60 provides a thrilling driving experience while maintaining efficiency.
Fuel efficiency is paramount in today’s automotive market, and both models offer commendable figures. The Mazda CX-80 consumes an impressive 1.6 L/100 km in its hybrid variant while the Diesel MHEV variant shows a consumption of 5.7 L/100 km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the CX-80 performs admirably with a class B rating, releasing just 35 g/km in the hybrid variant.
In contrast, the Volvo XC60, while not matching the CX-80’s electric efficiency, manages a respectable fuel consumption of 7.7 L/100 km in its gasoline variant, with CO2 emissions varying per model but reaching as low as 22 g/km for the hybrid variant. This puts the XC60 in a favorable light for eco-conscious consumers.
Inside, the Mazda CX-80 boasts a spacious cabin with cutting-edge technology. It offers a host of driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and advanced infotainment systems that enhance the driving experience. The option of seven seats makes it a practical choice for families.
Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 emphasizes luxury and comfort, featuring premium materials and an intuitive infotainment system that is the hallmark of the Scandinavian brand. With a comfortable layout and seating for five, it focuses on creating a serene driving environment, supplemented by advanced safety features like Pilot Assist and a robust suite of the latest driver support technologies.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs. The CX-80 stands out with its larger size and hybrid efficiency, making it a favorite for families seeking comfort and space. In contrast, the XC60 makes a strong case with its exhilarating performance and luxurious touches, perfect for those looking to combine practicality with a premium experience.
Both vehicles showcase the remarkable advancements in the SUV segment and highlight the unique strengths of their respective brands. Whichever choice you make, you’ll be driving away in a vehicle that reflects the future of driving excellence.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 47400 - 59400
£
|
Price
about 48800 - 74600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 7.7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
60
km
|
Electric Range
79 - 80
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7
kWh
|
co2
35 - 148
g/km
|
co2
22 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240
kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150
kg
|
Trunk capacity
258
L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483
L
|
Length
4995
mm
|
Length
4688
mm
|
Width
1890
mm
|
Width
1902
mm
|
Height
1714
mm
|
Height
1658
mm
|
Payload
649 - 650
kg
|
Payload
510 - 550
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
254 - 327
HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9
s
|
Max Speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
500 - 550
Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
187 - 241
kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335
kW
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.