VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (49300 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Volvo XC60?

CX-80

The automotive landscape is evolving rapidly, with consumer preferences shifting towards SUVs that embody both luxury and practicality. In this comprehensive comparison, we take a closer look at two remarkable contenders: the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60. Both vehicles offer unique features, state-of-the-art technologies, and impressive performance metrics, making them prime examples of modern automotive engineering.

XC60

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-80 is a larger SUV, measuring 4995 mm in length and 1890 mm in width, which translates to a more spacious interior, capable of accommodating up to seven passengers. Its bold and elegant design language reflects Mazda's Kodo design philosophy, making it a head-turner on the road.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 presents a more compact profile, with a length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm, ideal for urban environments while still exuding an air of sophistication. Though it seats five, the XC60’s premium materials and minimalist Scandinavian design make it a luxury unto itself.

CX-80

Engine Options and Performance

Both vehicles come equipped with advanced powertrains that promise exceptional performance and efficiency. The Mazda CX-80 offers two engine options, including a robust 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV, allowing for a maximum torque of 550 Nm. The CX-80 has an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 6.8 seconds combined with an electric range of 60 km, making it both powerful and economical.

In comparison, the Volvo XC60 presents a wider power range with options peaking at 455 HP. The standout performance is from its higher-end Plug-in Hybrid version that achieves 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. With a maximum torque of 709 Nm and an electric range of 80 km, the XC60 provides a thrilling driving experience while maintaining efficiency.

XC60

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is paramount in today’s automotive market, and both models offer commendable figures. The Mazda CX-80 consumes an impressive 1.6 L/100 km in its hybrid variant while the Diesel MHEV variant shows a consumption of 5.7 L/100 km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the CX-80 performs admirably with a class B rating, releasing just 35 g/km in the hybrid variant.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60, while not matching the CX-80’s electric efficiency, manages a respectable fuel consumption of 7.7 L/100 km in its gasoline variant, with CO2 emissions varying per model but reaching as low as 22 g/km for the hybrid variant. This puts the XC60 in a favorable light for eco-conscious consumers.

CX-80

Interior and Technology Features

Inside, the Mazda CX-80 boasts a spacious cabin with cutting-edge technology. It offers a host of driver-assistance features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and advanced infotainment systems that enhance the driving experience. The option of seven seats makes it a practical choice for families.

Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 emphasizes luxury and comfort, featuring premium materials and an intuitive infotainment system that is the hallmark of the Scandinavian brand. With a comfortable layout and seating for five, it focuses on creating a serene driving environment, supplemented by advanced safety features like Pilot Assist and a robust suite of the latest driver support technologies.

XC60

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs. The CX-80 stands out with its larger size and hybrid efficiency, making it a favorite for families seeking comfort and space. In contrast, the XC60 makes a strong case with its exhilarating performance and luxurious touches, perfect for those looking to combine practicality with a premium experience.

Both vehicles showcase the remarkable advancements in the SUV segment and highlight the unique strengths of their respective brands. Whichever choice you make, you’ll be driving away in a vehicle that reflects the future of driving excellence.

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • minimal cheaper
  • evident more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • distinct more electric range
  • noticeable quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • decisively more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC60 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 137 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 performs distinct better – achieving up to 82 km, about 22 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls noticeable stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is a bit lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 231 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers decisively more room – 483 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 225 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 somewhat takes the win – 650 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

Price
49300 - 61400 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
-
Length
4708 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
-
Height
1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1543 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.