VS

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Caddy Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 25,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or VW Caddy Compact Van?

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Caddy Compact Van: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
details

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW Caddy Compact Van is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,507 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy Compact Van uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the VW Caddy Compact Van offers substantially more range – reaching up to 120 km, about 60 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Caddy Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly lighter – 1,442 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 689 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Caddy Compact Van carries a bit more – 759 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,800
Caddy Compact Van

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 117 - 120 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Caddy Compact Van

The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.

details
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife

Reviews VW Caddy Compact Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Tourneo Connect
VW Caddy Compact Van
VS
The Ford Tourneo Connect and VW Caddy Compact Van compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
VW Caddy
VW Caddy Compact Van
VS
The VW Caddy and VW Caddy Compact Van compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Ford Transit Connect
VW Caddy Compact Van
VS
The Ford Transit Connect and VW Caddy Compact Van compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-80
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
25,800 - 42,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
11 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
7
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,818 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,819 - 1,823 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 3,700 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
628 - 759 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.