Compare performance (327 HP vs 462 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 64,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or VW Touareg?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving segment of SUVs, the 2024 Mazda CX-80 and the 2023 VW Touareg proudly uphold their positions as versatile powerhouses. Both are equipped with state-of-the-art technology and engineering finesse, appealing to the modern driver seeking comfort, innovation, and performance wrapped in a stylish package.
The Mazda CX-80 boasts a robust stature with dimensions measuring 4,995 mm in length, 1,890 mm in width, and 1,714 mm in height. Its sculpted design features sharp lines and an aerodynamic silhouette, making it as fashionable as it is functional. Meanwhile, the VW Touareg, slightly shorter at 4,902 mm in length but wider at 1,984 mm, offers a more compact yet formidable presence. The Touareg's sleek design encompasses luxury and aerodynamics, with standout front fascia details.
The CX-80 provides options between a Plug-in Hybrid and a Diesel MHEV, delivering power outputs of 327 HP and 254 HP respectively. It features an automatic gearbox with all-wheel drive capable of an acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 6.8 seconds for the hybrid variant. Its impressive electric range stands at 60 km, catering perfectly to eco-conscious urban commuters.
On the other hand, the VW Touareg doesn't shy away from offering diverse engine options, including Diesel, Petrol, and Plug-in Hybrid variants. The top-end Plug-in Hybrid variant churns out a powerful 462 HP, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.1 seconds. It features an electric-only range of up to 51 km, with a commendable battery capacity of 14.3 kWh.
Mazda's CX-80 offers a family-friendly 7-seat configuration, emphasizing spacious interiors and premium comfort. Attention to detail is evident with luxurious materials and advanced infotainment systems, enhancing the overall driving experience.
Conversely, the Touareg provides a more intimate setting with a 5-seat arrangement, but it compensates with a massive trunk capacity extending up to 810 L, perfect for adventure-filled getaways. The high-quality interior integrates cutting-edge technology, ensuring both comfort and connectivity.
The Mazda CX-80 exhibits commendable fuel efficiency, particularly with its plugin hybrid option, which achieves a low fuel consumption of 1.6 L/100km and a CO2 emission of just 35 g/km. This contributes to its B CO2 efficiency class, marking it as an eco-friendly choice.
Similarly, the Touareg’s plugin hybrid model presents itself as an efficient option in its class, with a consumption as low as 2.2 L/100km and CO2 emissions pegged at 48 g/km, warranting a B efficiency class badge.
Deciding between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg is no simple task. Each SUV brings its unique blend of power, efficiency, and luxury. The CX-80 proves attractive to those valuing extended seating capabilities and hybrid efficiency, while the Touareg offers performance zealots high-end power configurations and substantial cargo space. Ultimately, the choice boils down to personal preference for seating capacity, performance needs, and environmental considerations.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-80 is visibly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the VW Touareg costs 64,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,979 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the VW Touareg with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 11 km more than the VW Touareg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Touareg offers noticeably more power – delivering 462 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 135 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Touareg is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.1 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Touareg delivers markedly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, VW Touareg is barely lighter – 2,059 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 72 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Touareg offers significantly more boot space – 810 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 552 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW Touareg carries a bit more – 751 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 101 kg.
The VW Touareg leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Volkswagen Touareg wraps a grown-up presence in a classy, well-appointed cabin that feels more like a premium saloon than an SUV. It glides with quiet composure, devours long journeys and tucks away clever tech that makes life easier whether you’re stuck in town or nipping off the beaten track.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
64,300 - 88,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 10.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
47 - 49 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.3 kWh
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
119 - 239 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
75 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
2,059 - 2,470 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
665 - 810 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,878 - 4,902 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,984 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,693 - 1,712 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,675 - 1,800 L
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
550 - 751 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
231 - 462 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.1 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
222 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 700 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
6
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
170 - 340 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,967 - 2,995 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España