VS

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Touran comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or VW Touran?

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Touran: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW Touran

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Touran is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,333 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the VW Touran with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

Touran

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers significantly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the VW Touran takes 8.9 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers markedly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, VW Touran is clearly lighter – 1,520 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 611 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Touran offers clearly more boot space – 834 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 576 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries only slightly more – 650 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
VW Tiguan
VW Touran
VS
Deciding between the VW Tiguan and the VW Touran comes down to whether you prefer SUV style and road presence or MPV practicality for family life. The Tiguan delivers a higher driving position, sharper styling and more versatile on-road performance, while the Touran focuses on flexible seating, …
Mazda CX-80
VW Touran

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Touran

The VW Touran is a sensible family people‑carrier that mixes practical packaging with tidy, German-built refinement, making everyday life with kids and shopping feel a lot less chaotic. If you want a reliable, no-nonsense companion that drives with surprising poise and values usefulness over flash, the Touran is a very persuasive choice.

details
DB2015AU01084_retina_2400
DB2015AU01088_retina_2400
DB2015AU01085_retina_2400
DB2015AU01093_retina_2400
DB2015AU01090_retina_2400

Reviews VW Touran

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
Anders
23 May 2026, 15:27:48

It really is the Swiss Army knife. Six people on holiday at a summer cottage including all their luggage. Or how about four people in the car plus a dishwasher standing in as baggage. Or five people, two of them in child seats plus two strollers in the back. And it's also super comfortable on long trips. You sit well and it has a nice interior. Today there's nothing comparable that can replace it. Oh, and it actually does the 16–17 km/l it's rated for.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW Touran
VW Caddy
VS
If you want a car-like family MPV with a polished interior, refined ride and tidy handling, the VW Touran feels like the grown-up choice for daily driving and longer trips. But if practicality rules—max cargo, sliding doors and a no-nonsense, van-like toughness—the VW Caddy is the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Peugeot 5008
VW Touran
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 5008 and the Volkswagen Touran comes down to whether you prefer SUV-style presence and flexible seating or a conventional MPV that prioritizes practical space and everyday usability. This comparison focuses on real-world comfort, versatility, economy and driving feel to …
VW Touran
VW Tayron
VS
The VW Touran remains the no-nonsense family workhorse — clever 7-seat packaging, sliding rear seats and sensible engines make it the practical choice when boot space and child seats are top priorities. The VW Tayron, by contrast, dresses up as a chunky SUV with higher stance and sharper styling, …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Skoda Karoq
VW Touran
VS
Skoda Karoq and VW Touran go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Karoq or the VW Touran …
Mazda CX-80
VW Touran

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
36,000 - 45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
136 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
MPV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,520 - 1,631 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
834 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
590 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.