VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Volvo EC40 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Volvo EC40?

Mazda MX-30 vs Volvo EC40: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Volvo EC40

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda MX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,686 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EC40 is moderately more efficient: consuming 16.2 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 500 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 272 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is slightly lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 216 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EC40 offers a bit more boot space – 404 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries very slightly more – 435 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,500
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 486 - 585 km
Mazda MX-30
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
Mazda MX-30
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.