@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (170 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (30800 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Volvo XC40?

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda MX-30 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30800 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5914 £.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a a bit edge – offering 197 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC40 performs noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is slight lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1849 kg. The difference is around 161 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers distinct more room – 452 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs to a small extent better – up to 1328 L, which is about 173 L more than the Mazda MX-30.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 evident takes the win – 532 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 130 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda MX-30 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda MX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £30,800
MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda MX-30

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.30 kWh
  • Electric Range : 85 km
details
Mazda MX-30
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Mazda MX-30
Volvo XC40
MX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
30800 - 37100 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
18.30 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1849 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1848 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1555 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1137 - 1155 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
402 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.10 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda HR-V
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking …
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.