Two cars, one duel: Mercedes A-Class meets Toyota Aygo.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, car enthusiasts and everyday drivers alike are always on the lookout for vehicles that meet their individual needs. This time, we put two distinct contenders against each other: the luxurious and performance-oriented Mercedes A-Klasse and the compact, city-friendly Toyota Aygo. Let's dive into a detailed comparison of these two cars, considering their technical specifications and innovations.
The Mercedes A-Klasse offers a variety of engine options including petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrid variants. With power outputs ranging from 116 HP up to a formidable 421 HP, it provides an exhilarating experience for those who crave performance. The plug-in hybrid variant includes an impressive electric range of 86 km, ideal for urban commutes. In contrast, the Toyota Aygo is equipped with a no-frills 1.0-liter petrol engine producing 72 HP, designed primarily for efficiency and easy city driving. The Aygo's top speed stands at 158 km/h, considerably less than the A-Klasse which maxes out at 270 km/h.
Both cars highlight fuel efficiency, with the Aygo taking a slight edge due to its smaller engine and lighter structure. The Aygo achieves an admirable consumption rate of 4.8 - 4.9 L/100km and maintains a CO2 efficiency class of C. The Mercedes A-Klasse, while more performant, varies significantly depending on the engine configuration, offering a consumption rate starting from 5.0 L/100km with its diesel variant to 8.3 L/100km for powerful petrol engines. The plug-in hybrid version of the A-Klasse offers a notable 0.7 L/100km when in hybrid mode, reflecting Mercedes' commitment to emissions reduction.
The Mercedes A-Klasse sports a sleek hatchback design, characterized by a length of up to 4453 mm and a width of 1850 mm. Its elegant profile commands attention on both urban streets and highways. Conversely, the Toyota Aygo, embraced in its current iteration as a compact SUV, measures a shorter 3700 mm in length with a width of 1740 mm, perfect for navigating tight city spaces.
Inside the A-Klasse, expect premium materials and a suite of technology including a dual-clutch automatic transmission and state-of-the-art infotainment systems across its models. The car comfortably seats five occupants, offering a trunk capacity of up to 350 liters and a payload of 480 kg. In contrast, the Toyota Aygo, designed with minimalism in mind, seats four with a trunk capacity of 231 liters and a 345 kg payload. Though smaller, it efficiently utilizes space and features user-friendly tech suited for its segment.
The Mercedes A-Klasse and Toyota Aygo cater to fundamentally different audiences. The A-Klasse represents luxury, power, and cutting-edge technology, while the Aygo provides practicality, affordability, and maneuverability in urban settings. Whether you're drawn to the sophisticated performance of the A-Klasse or the efficient, compact charm of the Aygo, both cars embody unique strengths perfectly tailored to their target demographics.
Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Aygo has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £, while the Mercedes A-Class costs 32300 £. That’s a price difference of around 16757 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes A-Class manages with 2.30 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Toyota Aygo with 4.80 L. The difference is about 2.50 L per 100 km.
Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes A-Class has a clearly edge – offering 320 HP compared to 72 HP. That’s roughly 248 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes A-Class is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.70 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 10.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes A-Class performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 92 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes A-Class pulls clearly stronger with 450 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 357 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mercedes A-Class offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, the Toyota Aygo is decisively lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1440 kg. The difference is around 425 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes A-Class offers noticeable more room – 350 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 119 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes A-Class performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1190 L, which is about 361 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes A-Class clearly perceptible takes the win – 485 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 140 kg.
All in all, the Mercedes A-Class shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It impresses with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile companion for everyday use.
The Mercedes-Benz A-Class is a perfect blend of luxury and practicality, offering a refined interior that boasts high-quality materials and meticulous attention to detail. It's designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic that appeals to those who appreciate both style and performance. The driving experience is enhanced by cutting-edge technology and a range of features that provide both comfort and safety on every journey.
detailsThe Toyota Aygo presents itself as a compact city car, perfect for navigating tight urban spaces with ease. Its stylish design is complemented by a vibrant variety of colour options, making it a standout choice for those looking to express their individuality. Inside, the Aygo offers a comfortable and functional cabin, equipped with modern features that enhance the overall driving experience.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32300 - 55600 £
|
Price
15500 - 22100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 8.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
12.90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 188 g/km
|
co2
108 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 - 51 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1440 - 1695 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
4428 - 4447 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1796 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1407 - 1423 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1125 - 1190 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
475 - 485 kg
|
Payload
345 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 320 HP
|
Power HP
72 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
15.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
202 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 450 Nm
|
Torque
93 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 235 kW
|
Power kW
53 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1991 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.