Compare performance (131 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (21,700 £ vs 22,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan Transporter or Peugeot Rifter?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Citan Transporter is barely cheaper – starting at 21,700 £ , while the Peugeot Rifter costs 22,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,119 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Citan Transporter uses 5.1 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot Rifter is barely more efficient: consuming 18.3 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Citan Transporter. That’s a difference of about 0.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot Rifter offers slightly more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 49 km more than the Mercedes Citan Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot Rifter offers only slightly more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot Rifter is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 11.3 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.7 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Citan Transporter is noticeably faster – reaching 183 km/h, while the Peugeot Rifter tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Rifter delivers only slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan Transporter is barely lighter – 1,381 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 117 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Citan Transporter offers very slightly more capacity – up to 3,620 L, about 120 L more than the Peugeot Rifter.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries barely more – 814 kg compared to 787 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.
The Peugeot Rifter comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
|
Price
22,900 - 36,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 19.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
|
Electric Range
328 - 339 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 156 g/km
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,941 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
322 - 1,050 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,405 - 4,755 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,818 - 1,837 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,000 - 3,500 L
|
|
Payload
449 - 787 kg
|
Payload
489 - 814 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E, F
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Peugeot
|