@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mercedes E-Class Wagon vs Volvo XC40 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Mercedes E-Class Wagon meets Volvo XC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

E-Class Wagon @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo XC40 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Mercedes E-Class Wagon costs 52600 £. That’s a price difference of around 15870 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes E-Class Wagon manages with 1.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 4.80 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes E-Class Wagon has a clearly edge – offering 585 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 388 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes E-Class Wagon is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.10 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes E-Class Wagon performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes E-Class Wagon pulls decisively stronger with 750 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm difference.

E-Class Wagon @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is to a small extent lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 212 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes E-Class Wagon offers distinct more room – 615 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 163 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes E-Class Wagon performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1830 L, which is about 502 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes E-Class Wagon slightly takes the win – 645 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 113 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes E-Class Wagon shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £52,600
E-Class Wagon @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes E-Class Wagon

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 186 - 585 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 7.9 L
  • Electric Range : 97 - 109 km
details

Mercedes E-Class Wagon

The Mercedes-Benz E-Class Wagon offers a harmonious blend of luxury and practicality, making it a favourite for those who value both style and functionality. Its sleek exterior design is matched by a sophisticated interior that provides a comfortable and spacious environment for both driver and passengers. This vehicle also boasts advanced technology features, ensuring a smooth and connected driving experience.

details
16C947_04 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
16C947_16 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
16C947_07 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
16C722_002 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Volvo XC40

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Mercedes E-Class Wagon
Volvo XC40
E-Class Wagon @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
52600 - 121800 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 7.9 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
97 - 109 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
21.20 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
44 - 181 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 66 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1900 - 2435 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 615 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4949 - 4959 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1880 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1469 - 1497 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1675 - 1830 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
540 - 645 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
186 - 585 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 8.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
213 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
320 - 750 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
137 - 430 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1993 - 2999 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E, F, B, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
When it comes to choosing between the Ford Explorer EV and the Volvo XC40 Recharge, each offers distinct advantages for the discerning SUV enthusiast. The Ford Explorer EV boasts a spacious interior and impressive range, catering to those who prioritize practicality and family-friendly features. …
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes E-Class Wagon have?

The Mercedes E-Class Wagon is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.