Compare performance (228 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Nissan Qashqai?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving landscape of SUVs, the Mercedes EQA and Nissan Qashqai stand as formidable contenders, each offering distinct technology and design philosophies. For those on the hunt for a new ride, balancing luxury with efficiency or versatility with affordability, this comparison sheds light on how each vehicle holds its ground.
Both the Mercedes EQA and Nissan Qashqai fall under the SUV category, yet they bring different stylistic appeals. The EQA, with its sleek and futuristic aesthetic, emphasizes premium design synonymous with its brand, making use of smooth lines and LED lighting. Meanwhile, the Qashqai presents a robust and modern exterior, showcasing Nissan's approach to combining utility with contemporary design.
The powertrains of these SUVs showcase their distinct engineering goals. The Mercedes EQA is an all-electric SUV boasting power outputs ranging from 190 HP to 292 HP, with torque ranging from 385 Nm to 520 Nm. This culminates in spirited accelerations, the quickest reaching from 0 to 100 km/h in just 6 seconds. Additionally, it operates with impressive CO2 efficiency class A, ensuring an emissions-free journey.
In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai is offered with petrol MHEV and full hybrid powertrains. The power ranges from 140 HP to 190 HP with a torque spectrum of 240 Nm to 330 Nm. While the Qashqai features slightly slower acceleration times, starting from 7.9 seconds to 10.2 seconds, its expeditious handling and maximum speeds reaching 206 km/h cater to agile city driving and open road efficiency.
Innovative efficiency is a hallmark of the Mercedes EQA, with its kWh/100km consumption ranging between 14.4 and 16.9, offering an electric range between 458 km to 561 km. This electric SUV not only prioritizes long-distance driving efficiency but also eco-friendly operation with zero emissions.
Nissan's Qashqai introduces hybrid technology, achieving fuel consumption from 5.1 L/100km to 6.8 L/100km. Despite its CO2 emissions being higher than the EQA, this hybrid setup still aims to bridge conventional fuel efficiency with lower environmental impacts. With a fuel tank capacity of 55 liters, the Qashqai asserts its stature in the realm of everyday practicality.
Inside the EQA, passengers are treated to a carefully curated interior with a focus on modern luxury, accommodating up to five passengers. The integration of digital interfaces, ambient lighting, and ergonomic design emphasizes a technology-forward experience.
The Qashqai’s interior excels in functionality and space, with a slightly larger trunk capacity, ranging up to 504 liters compared to the EQA's 340 liters. It offers an ergonomic layout with advanced infotainment systems and comfort, appealing to those looking for utility and family-friendly features.
Choosing between the Mercedes EQA and Nissan Qashqai often comes down to personal preferences. The EQA appeals to those who prioritize luxury, electric innovation, and zero emissions. If you value practicality, affordability, and hybrid efficiency, the Qashqai represents a reliable option blending modern design with day-to-day usability.
In the vibrant world of SUVs, both models offer fascinating innovations and experiences. Whichever you choose, remember to align your choice with lifestyle and priorities for a rewarding journey ahead.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Qashqai is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,269 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers slightly more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers moderately more torque with 390 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is considerably lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 695 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers visibly more boot space – 504 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries moderately more – 516 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
476 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
98 - 152 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,115 kg
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
446 - 516 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
228 HP
|
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
390 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
168 kW
|
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España