VS

Mercedes EQA vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (228 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Renault Arkana?

Mercedes EQA vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Arkana is significantly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,417 £.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers clearly more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 85 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.7 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers clearly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is clearly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 605 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries barely more – 451 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQA holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 228 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 476 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
Mercedes EQA
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
BMW iX2
Mercedes EQA
VS
Comparing the BMW iX2 and Mercedes EQA brings together two compact electric SUVs with different personalities: the iX2 favours sporty handling and driver engagement, while the EQA prioritises comfort and a polished Mercedes interior. Which suits you will come down to priorities like range, cabin …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
Mercedes EQA
smart #3
VS
In the growing electric vehicle market, the Mercedes EQA and smart #3 present two distinct approaches to urban mobility. The EQA offers luxury and performance, catering to drivers seeking sophisticated features and an upscale driving experience, while the smart #3 focuses on compact design and …
Mercedes CLA Coupe
Mercedes EQA
VS
In an electrifying matchup between the sleek Mercedes CLA Coupé and the innovative Mercedes EQA, drivers are offered a choice between potent gasoline dynamics and forward-thinking electric efficiency. The CLA Coupé enchants with its elegant design and turbocharged performance, tailored for driving …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLC
VS
Mercedes EQA and Mercedes GLC go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mercedes EQA
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
476 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
228 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
168 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.