VS

Mercedes EQA vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (228 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Toyota C-HR?

Mercedes EQA vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • substantially more electric range
details

Toyota C-HR

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR is significantly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,740 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers substantially more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 410 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers very slightly more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is considerably lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 610 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers markedly more boot space – 447 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 107 L.

Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 425 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQA is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 228 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 476 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
Mercedes EQA
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR wraps efficient hybrid drivetrains in dramatic, European‑tuned styling and a noticeably upmarket cabin, delivering composed ride quality and easy city manners that suit style‑minded commuters and company drivers. Accept a tighter, dim rear seat, a fiddly high‑lip boot and occasional CVT grumble plus persistent warning chimes, and you get a very economical, confident little crossover that prizes individuality over outright practicality.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Prius
VS
In this DriveDuel showdown we pit the sharp, coupe‑like Toyota C‑HR against the evergreen Toyota Prius to see whether style and urban swagger can outshine outright thriftiness. Choose the C‑HR for crossover looks, punchy handling and personality; pick the Prius for class‑leading fuel economy, …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: one offers quiet, premium refinement while the other dazzles with bold styling and better value. We put them through real-world checks — styling, comfort, tech and running costs — so you can decide whether to pick …
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like the posh roommate you suddenly inherited — plush cabin, hushed hybrid powertrain and a dashboard that whispers premium — while the Toyota C‑HR plays the affordable style rebel with quirky looks and surprisingly practical packaging. Choose the LBX for serene luxury and badge …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C‑HR is the flamboyant, coupe‑like crossover that trades rear-seat space for eye-catching design and a higher stance, while the Toyota Corolla is the dependable compact that serves up better packaging, comfort and efficient powertrains. If you want personality and city swagger, pick the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
In the battle between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla Cross, both models showcase the brand's commitment to blending style with functionality. The C-HR stands out with its bold, coupe-like design and sportier driving dynamics, appealing to a younger audience. Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
Mercedes EQA
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
476 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
228 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
168 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Toyota
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.