Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQA vs Volvo EC40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (292 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (44200 £ vs 46600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Volvo EC40?
EQA
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQA has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 44200 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2383 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the Volvo EC40 with 16.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 performs minimal better – achieving up to 584 km, about 23 km more than the Mercedes EQA.
EC40
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 has a noticeable edge – offering 442 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Volvo EC40 performs slightly better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EC40 pulls distinct stronger with 670 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
EQA
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mercedes EQA is slight lighter – 2045 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo EC40 offers slightly more room – 404 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 64 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQA performs barely noticeable better – up to 1320 L, which is about 124 L more than the Volvo EC40.
When it comes to payload, Volvo EC40 minimal takes the win – 435 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £46,600
Volvo EC40
Mercedes EQA
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
Price
46600 - 59000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
4463 mm
|
Length
4440 mm
|
|
Width
1834 mm
|
Width
1873 mm
|
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
Height
1591 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.