Mercedes EQA vs Volvo EC40 - Differences and prices compared

Q: How much power does the Mercedes EQA deliver on the road?

The Mercedes EQA reaches a peak output of 292 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What are the Mercedes EQA’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Mercedes EQA consumes around 14.40 kWh.

Q: What is the Mercedes EQA’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 561 km.

Q: How large is the Mercedes EQA’s battery?

The Mercedes EQA comes with a 70.50 kWh battery.

Q: How many liters of cargo space does the Mercedes EQA offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 340 L fit inside.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Mercedes EQA?

Overall, the Mercedes EQA is 4463 mm long, 1834 mm wide and 1608 mm high.

Q: What drivetrain options does the Volvo EC40 have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Volvo EC40's engine?

Depending on the version, the Volvo EC40 delivers up to 442 HP.

Q: What are the Volvo EC40’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Volvo EC40 consumes around 16.20 kWh.

Compare performance (292 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (44200 £ vs 46600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Volvo EC40?

scroll down

EQA

Introduction: A New Era of Compact Electric SUVs

As the automotive industry pivots towards electrification, the compact SUV segment is rapidly gaining traction among eco-conscious consumers. Two formidable contenders in this space are the Mercedes EQA and the Volvo EC40. These electric SUVs offer a blend of luxury, performance, and sustainability, vying for supremacy. Let’s delve into their technical aspects and innovative features to see how they stack up against each other.

EC40

Performance and Power: A Tale of Two Drives

The Mercedes EQA is equipped with an electric motor producing between 190 and 292 HP, available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. Its acceleration ranges from 8.6 to a brisk 6 seconds for 0 to 100 km/h, depending on the variant. With a maximum speed of 160 km/h, the EQA delivers a solid driving experience.

On the other hand, the Volvo EC40 offers slightly more potent performance options, producing between 238 and 408 HP. Available with rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options, it accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 4.6 seconds. Its top speed reaches 180 km/h, showcasing Volvo’s commitment to safety without compromising excitement.

scroll down

EQA

Range and Efficiency: Where Distance Meets Economy

The EQA provides a commendable electric range, extending from 458 to 561 km on a single charge, with consumption varying from 14.4 to 16.9 kWh/100km. Its battery capacity ranges from 66.5 to 70.5 kWh, perfectly balancing power with efficiency.

Meanwhile, the EC40 competes fiercely with a range of 487 to 584 km, and energy consumption spanning from 16.2 to 17.3 kWh/100km. Boasting a slightly larger battery capacity of up to 79 kWh, the EC40 impresses with its efficiency over long distances.

Design and Dimensions: Crafting the Aesthetic

In terms of design, the EQA and EC40 are both quintessential examples of their brands. The EQA measures 4463 mm in length, 1834 mm in width, and up to 1613 mm in height, offering a compact yet substantial presence. Mercedes' signature styling and aerodynamic efficiency are evident throughout.

The EC40 stands slightly shorter, measuring 4440 mm in length and 1591 mm in height but rewards with greater width at 1873 mm. Volvo's contemporary design language shines, harmonizing aesthetics with function.

Interior Comfort and Space: Luxury Meets Utility

Both models seat up to five passengers comfortably. The EQA offers a trunk capacity of 340 liters, suitable for everyday needs. With the focus on luxury, Mercedes has integrated high-end materials and technology to enhance the driving experience.

The EC40 outmatches with a more generous trunk space of 404 liters, presenting Volvo's dedication to practicality. Interior design is infused with Scandinavian minimalism, offering both style and functionality.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Fit

In choosing between the Mercedes EQA and Volvo EC40, buyers are treated to top-tier innovation and distinct personality traits. The EQA appeals to those seeking a blend of luxury and efficiency, complemented by Mercedes' hallmark features. Meanwhile, the EC40 caters to performance enthusiasts who prioritize cutting-edge design and spirited driving dynamics.

Ultimately, both models validate the shift towards electrification, representing a significant stride towards sustainable urban mobility. Whether you prefer the German precision of the EQA or the Scandinavian charm of the EC40, both of these electric SUVs represent the future of sustainable luxury.

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mercedes EQA has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 44200 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2383 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the Volvo EC40 with 16.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.

As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 performs minimal better – achieving up to 584 km, about 23 km more than the Mercedes EQA.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 has a noticeable edge – offering 442 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo EC40 performs slightly better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EC40 pulls distinct stronger with 670 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mercedes EQA is slight lighter – 2045 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo EC40 offers slightly more room – 404 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 64 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQA performs barely noticeable better – up to 1320 L, which is about 124 L more than the Volvo EC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo EC40 minimal takes the win – 435 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mercedes EQA

Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption kWh/100km

Electric Range

Battery Capacity

co2

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Max Speed

Torque

Power kW

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Max trunk capacity

Payload

from about £46,600

Volvo EC40

Price : 46600 - 59000 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Electric
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
Consumption kWh/100km : 16.2 - 17.3 kWh
Electric Range : 488 - 584 km
Battery Capacity : 67 - 79 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 4.6 - 7.3 s
Model Year : 2024
Max Speed : 180 km/h
Torque : 420 - 670 Nm
Doors : 5
Model : EC40
Modell : EC40 Single Motor, EC40 Single Motor Extended Range, EC40 Twin Motor, EC40 Twin Motor Performance
CO2 Efficiency Class : A
Trim Level : Core, Plus Dark, Plus Black Edition, Ultra Black Edition, Ultra Dark, Core AWD, Plus Black Edition AWD, Plus Dark AWD, Ultra Black Edition AWD, Ultra Dark AWD
Power kW : 175 - 325 kW
co2 : 0 g/km
Curb weight : 2065 - 2185 kg
Trunk capacity : 404 L
Length : 4440 mm
Width : 1873 mm
Height : 1591 mm
Brand : Volvo
Max trunk capacity : 1196 L
Payload : 395 - 435 kg

details

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details

Top Car Comparisons

Mercedes EQA

Volvo EX40

The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …

BMW iX1

Mercedes EQA

The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …

Mercedes EQA

Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
Price 44200 - 57400 £	Price 46600 - 59000 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km 14.4 - 16.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km 16.2 - 17.3 kWh
Electric Range 476 - 561 km	Electric Range 488 - 584 km
Battery Capacity 70.50 kWh	Battery Capacity 67 - 79 kWh
co2 0 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2045 - 2115 kg	Curb weight 2065 - 2185 kg
Trunk capacity 340 L	Trunk capacity 404 L
Length 4463 mm	Length 4440 mm
Width 1834 mm	Width 1873 mm
Height 1608 - 1613 mm	Height 1591 mm
Max trunk capacity 1320 L	Max trunk capacity 1196 L
Payload 425 kg	Payload 395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 190 - 292 HP	Power HP 238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6 - 8.6 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed 160 km/h	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 385 - 520 Nm	Torque 420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 140 - 215 kW	Power kW 175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity -