Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQE SUV vs Tesla Model 3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (625 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (71600 £ vs 31700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQE SUV or Tesla Model 3?
EQE SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Tesla Model 3 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 31700 £ , while the Mercedes EQE SUV costs 71600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39848 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13 kWh per 100 km, it’s decisively more efficient than the Mercedes EQE SUV with 18.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 5.30 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 750 km, about 139 km more than the Mercedes EQE SUV.
Model 3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE SUV has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 625 HP compared to 460 HP. That’s roughly 165 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Mercedes EQE SUV takes 3.70 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 262 km/h, while the Mercedes EQE SUV tops out at 240 km/h. The difference is around 22 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQE SUV pulls noticeable stronger with 950 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 290 Nm difference.
EQE SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is evident lighter – 1772 kg compared to 2440 kg. The difference is around 668 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers somewhat more room – 594 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 74 L.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQE SUV distinct takes the win – 580 kg compared to 377 kg. That’s a difference of about 203 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQE SUV
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £31,700
Tesla Model 3
Mercedes EQE SUV
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.
details
Tesla Model 3
3.8 (4 Reviews)
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
Mercedes EQE SUV
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
71600 - 125100 £
|
Price
31700 - 50100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
83 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2440 - 2615 kg
|
Curb weight
1772 - 1929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
4863 - 4879 mm
|
Length
4724 mm
|
|
Width
1940 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1672 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1675 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 580 kg
|
Payload
303 - 377 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
262 km/h
|
|
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Tesla
|
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQE SUV?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.