Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQE vs Tesla Model 3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (625 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (57600 £ vs 34300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQE or Tesla Model 3?
EQE
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Tesla Model 3 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34300 £ , while the Mercedes EQE costs 57600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23311 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Mercedes EQE with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 performs minimal better – achieving up to 750 km, about 59 km more than the Mercedes EQE.
Model 3
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE has a evident edge – offering 625 HP compared to 460 HP. That’s roughly 165 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Mercedes EQE takes 3.50 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs to a small extent better – reaching 262 km/h, while the Mercedes EQE tops out at 220 km/h. The difference is around 42 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQE pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 950 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 290 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
EQE
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is distinct lighter – 1822 kg compared to 2375 kg. The difference is around 553 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers noticeable more room – 594 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQE decisively takes the win – 600 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 267 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model 3 comes out ahead with a more balanced overall result in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQE
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Tesla Model 3
Mercedes EQE
4.3 (2 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQE glides like a silk-wrapped saloon from the future, pairing whisper-quiet refinement with a high-tech cabin that feels both modern and indulgent. For buyers who want electric luxury without shouting about it, the EQE is composed, comfortably confident, and just smug enough to feel special.
details
Tesla Model 3
2.9 (2 Reviews)
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
Mercedes EQE
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
57600 - 94900 £
|
Price
34300 - 50100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 20.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
502 - 691 km
|
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2375 - 2540 kg
|
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
4946 - 4964 mm
|
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
|
|
Width
1961 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1492 - 1510 mm
|
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
545 - 600 kg
|
Payload
303 - 333 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 6.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
|
|
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Tesla
|
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQE?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.