Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQS SUV vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (658 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (95,000 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or MINI Aceman?
Mercedes EQS SUV vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQS SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 67,972 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 19.6 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQS SUV. That’s a difference of about 5.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers substantially more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 340 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 400 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm more.
EQS SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is considerably lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 975 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more boot space – 645 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 345 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS SUV carries very slightly more – 570 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
Mercedes EQS SUV
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
5,125 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.