Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MINI Aceman?
Ford Puma vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,086 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is barely more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.1 kWh/100km for the MINI Aceman. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers a bit more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 62 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers clearly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers slightly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries slightly more – 530 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
Ford Puma
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Ford Puma
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
49.2 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,079 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,514 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,005 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.