Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQS vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (585 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (80,900 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Mercedes EQS vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQS
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 80,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,488 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQS is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers markedly more range – reaching up to 920 km, about 320 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS offers slightly more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 98 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes EQS takes 4.1 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers moderately more torque with 950 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
EQS
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is somewhat lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,550 kg. The difference is around 389 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers somewhat more boot space – 610 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS carries noticeably more – 570 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £80,900
Mercedes EQS
Mercedes EQS
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQS
The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Mercedes EQS
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
80,900 - 117,500 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
810 - 920 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,550 - 2,660 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
610 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,926 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
545 - 570 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
367 - 585 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
505 - 800 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
270 - 430 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.