Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Peugeot Rifter comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (27800 £ vs 22900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Peugeot Rifter?
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot Rifter has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22900 £ , while the Mercedes EQT costs 27800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4914 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Peugeot Rifter: with 18.30 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Mercedes EQT with 19.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Peugeot Rifter performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 339 km, about 61 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Rifter
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot Rifter has a slightly edge – offering 136 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot Rifter is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.30 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 132 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot Rifter pulls a bit stronger with 300 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Peugeot Rifter is distinct lighter – 1498 kg compared to 1925 kg. The difference is around 427 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers decisively more room – 1050 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 499 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot Rifter performs clearly better – up to 3500 L, which is about 1521 L more than the Mercedes EQT.
When it comes to payload, Peugeot Rifter evident takes the win – 814 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 283 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot Rifter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQT
Peugeot Rifter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £22,900
Peugeot Rifter
Mercedes EQT
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Peugeot Rifter
4.7 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.
details
Mercedes EQT
Peugeot Rifter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
Price
22900 - 36600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 19.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
328 - 339 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
Curb weight
1498 - 1941 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
322 - 1050 L
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
4405 - 4755 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1848 mm
|
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
Height
1818 - 1837 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 3500 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
489 - 814 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E, F
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.