Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Renault Scénic comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 34,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Renault Scénic?
Mercedes EQT vs Renault Scénic: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes EQT is noticeably cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Renault Scénic costs 34,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,854 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Scénic is somewhat more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Scénic offers significantly more range – reaching up to 598 km, about 320 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Scénic
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Scénic offers substantially more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 96 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Scénic is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Scénic is clearly faster – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 38 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Scénic delivers slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Scénic is very slightly lighter – 1,822 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers barely more boot space – 551 L compared to 545 L. That’s a difference of about 6 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQT offers somewhat more capacity – up to 1,979 L, about 309 L more than the Renault Scénic.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries very slightly more – 531 kg compared to 518 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Scénic is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,600
Renault Scénic
Mercedes EQT
Renault Scénic
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Renault Scénic
The Renault Scenic is a practical and comfortable family car that prioritises interior flexibility and everyday usability. With a composed ride and clever storage solutions, it suits buyers who want a versatile, easy-to-live-with vehicle for family duties and daily driving.
details
Mercedes EQT
Renault Scénic
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
34,600 - 44,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,927 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,470 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,571 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
514 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.