VS

Mercedes EQT vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Volvo XC60?

Mercedes EQT vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • somewhat lighter
details

Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQT

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mercedes EQT is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,503 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQT offers substantially more range – reaching up to 278 km, about 199 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 284 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 7.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers considerably more torque with 669 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 424 Nm more.

EQT

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is somewhat lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 225 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries barely more – 531 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Mercedes EQT
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details
23C0128_203_1
23C0128_111_1
23C0128_107_1
23C0128_006_0
23C0128_212_1

Reviews Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Jakub
2 Jul 2026, 06:56:49

I own an XC60 2.4 D3 and I'm delighted. I suspect that later generations of the car are only better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the Volvo XC60 pits a practical, value-focused compact crossover against a more premium, comfort- and safety-oriented compact SUV. If you prioritize everyday efficiency and sensible running costs the Qashqai is a smart, budget-friendly choice, while the XC60 suits …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
Deciding between the BMW X1 and the Volvo XC60 is essentially a choice between a sportier, more driver-focused compact SUV and a roomier, comfort-and-safety-oriented mid‑size contender. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving dynamics, fuel economy and running costs to help you pick the …
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Discovery Sport
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the Land Rover Discovery Sport are two popular premium SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking a blend of comfort, safety and capability. The XC60 leans toward refined on-road manners and class-leading safety tech, while the Discovery Sport emphasizes off-road ability and flexible …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
The Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 are two of the top contenders in the compact luxury SUV class, each bringing a distinct take on comfort, technology and driving dynamics. If you prioritize sporty refinement and a plush, tech-forward cabin the GLC is a strong choice; if you value Scandinavian design, …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
Mercedes EQT
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 531 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 Nm
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?

The Mercedes EQT is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.