Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes GLC EQ vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (489 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (61,100 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLC EQ or Mazda CX-80?
Mercedes GLC EQ vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
GLC EQ
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-80 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,770 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 654 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers visibly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 162 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers visibly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
GLC EQ
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is a bit lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers considerably more boot space – 570 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 312 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries markedly more – 650 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes GLC EQ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £61,100
Mercedes GLC EQ
Mercedes GLC EQ
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes GLC EQ
The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Mercedes GLC EQ
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,535 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,913 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
489 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
800 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.