@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mercedes GLC vs Volvo XC40 – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Mercedes GLC meets Volvo XC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GLC @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo XC40 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Mercedes GLC costs 50300 £. That’s a price difference of around 13565 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes GLC manages with 1.60 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 4.90 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC has a significantly edge – offering 680 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 483 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 4.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes GLC performs evident better – reaching 275 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 95 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes GLC pulls decisively stronger with 1020 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 720 Nm difference.

GLC @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is to a small extent lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1910 kg. The difference is around 222 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers clearly perceptible more room – 620 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 168 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes GLC performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1740 L, which is about 412 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes GLC a bit takes the win – 600 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes GLC shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £50,300
GLC @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes GLC

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 186 - 680 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 9.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 12 - 714 km
details

Mercedes GLC

4 (2)
rate

The Mercedes GLC blends plush cabin comfort and composed road manners into an SUV that feels more grown-up than it looks. It won’t shout for attention, but will quietly please buyers who want refinement, usable space and a touch of luxury without the drama.

details
22C0270_060 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0270_055 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0270_051 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0270_046 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0270_031 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC40
GLC @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
50300 - 126600 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.9 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
12 - 714 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 225 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
49 - 65 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1910 - 2535 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4716 - 4845 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1890 - 1913 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1603 - 1647 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1740 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
475 - 600 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
186 - 680 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
208 - 275 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
320 - 1020 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
137 - 500 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1991 - 2989 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025 - 2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, B, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLC
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, …
What drive types are available for the Mercedes GLC?

The Mercedes GLC is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.