VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • markedly more trunk space
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marco Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is slightly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,057 £.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 250 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes Marco Polo takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Mustang Mach-E offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is somewhat lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 289 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers markedly more boot space – 670 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 151 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Mercedes Marco Polo
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
Mercedes Marco Polo
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
5,140 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
1,975 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.