VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Renault Kangoo comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or Renault Kangoo?

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Renault Kangoo: Key differences

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Kangoo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marco Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Kangoo is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,771 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Kangoo uses 5.2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

Kangoo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers substantially more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 107 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes Marco Polo is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Marco Polo is markedly faster – reaching 220 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 85 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers considerably more torque with 500 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is clearly lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 961 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers noticeably more boot space – 950 L compared to 670 L. That’s a difference of about 280 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers noticeably more capacity – up to 4,630 L, about 1,580 L more than the Renault Kangoo.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries barely more – 650 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Kangoo holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
Kangoo

Renault Kangoo

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 278 - 285 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes Citan
Renault Kangoo
VS
The ongoing rivalry between the Mercedes Citan and the Renault Kangoo continues to captivate automotive enthusiasts, with both models appealing to those seeking versatility in compact vans. The Mercedes Citan distinguishes itself with its premium interior and sleek design, promising a touch of …
Peugeot Partner
Renault Kangoo
VS
In a clash of practicality versus flair, the Peugeot E-Partner Socio and the Renault Kangoo showcase distinct personalities tailored for diverse needs. The Socio, renowned for its innovative approach and stylish design, offers a comfortable ride with ample tech-savvy features that appeal to urban …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Renault Kangoo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details
serpimg_rTvtWU

Reviews Mercedes Marco Polo

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Kangoo

The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.

details
r221168p
r221165p
r221166p
r221163p
r221155p
r221162p

Reviews Renault Kangoo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen Berlingo
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the competitive segment of compact vans, the Citroën Berlingo and Renault Kangoo stand out for their practicality and versatility. While the Berlingo offers a more spacious interior and an innovative modular design, the Kangoo impresses with its fuel efficiency and advanced safety features. …
Renault Express
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the battle between the Renault Express and Renault Kangoo, both models offer practical solutions for urban mobility but cater to slightly different needs. The Express focuses on affordability and essential features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious consumers and small businesses. …
Renault Kangoo
Toyota Proace City
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact vans, the Renault Kangoo and the Toyota Proace City stand out with distinct features tailored for diverse needs. The Renault Kangoo impresses with its fuel-efficient engines and modular seating, making it a versatile choice for urban environments. Conversely, …
Peugeot Rifter
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the battle between the Peugeot Rifter and the Renault Kangoo, both versatile vans showcase their strengths in practicality and comfort. The Rifter impresses with its stylish design and advanced technology features, making it a popular choice for families and active lifestyles. Meanwhile, the …
Fiat Doblò
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the battle of European light commercial vehicles, the Fiat Doblò and Renault Kangoo showcase distinct capabilities that cater to professional and family needs alike. The Fiat Doblò impresses with its robust engine options and a versatile cargo area, making it a reliable partner for …
Mercedes EQV
Mercedes Marco Polo
VS
The Mercedes EQV and Mercedes Marco Polo compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan Townstar
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the competitive segment of compact vans, the Nissan Townstar and Renault Kangoo stand out for their practicality and efficiency. Both models boast spacious interiors and versatile cargo solutions, making them ideal for urban delivery needs. However, the Townstar's modern styling and enhanced …
Fiat Doblò Van
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the competitive world of compact commercial vehicles, the Fiat Doblò Van and the Renault Kangoo persistently impress with their unique blend of functionality, efficiency, and comfort. The Doblò Van is celebrated for its spacious cargo area and robust engine options, making it a preferred choice …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Renault Kangoo

Costs and Consumption
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
0 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Bus
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
4
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
Length
5,140 mm
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
Height
1,975 mm
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
459 - 610 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Marco Polo?

The Mercedes Marco Polo is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.