VS

Mercedes Sprinter Transporter vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (26,900 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Sprinter Transporter or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

Mercedes Sprinter Transporter vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

Mercedes Sprinter Transporter

  • clearly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Sprinter Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mercedes Sprinter Transporter is clearly cheaper – starting at 26,900 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,480 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 27.1 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Sprinter Transporter. That’s a difference of about 9.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers markedly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 156 km more than the Mercedes Sprinter Transporter.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 283 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 450 Nm. That’s about 500 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Mustang Mach-E offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Sprinter Transporter is barely lighter – 2,052 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Sprinter Transporter carries significantly more – 2,641 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 2,191 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Mercedes Sprinter Transporter
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Sprinter Transporter

The Mercedes Sprinter is the dependable workhorse that makes light of heavy loads, blending smart practicality with a surprisingly carlike cabin that keeps drivers sane on long runs. With a range of configurations and a reputation for durability, it’s the van buyers turn to when they need something tough, clever and oddly enjoyable to drive.

details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
Mercedes Sprinter Transporter
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

Price
26,900 - 72,900 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
27.1 - 31.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
194 - 444 km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
56 - 113 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 333 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,052 - 3,166 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
5,932 - 7,367 mm
Length
-
Width
1,993 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
2,331 - 2,663 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
9,000 - 15,500 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
577 - 2,641 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 204 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
90 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 450 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 150 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.