VS

Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Ford Kuga comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 243 HP), boot space and price (28,800 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Ford Kuga?

Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Ford Kuga: Key differences

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • moderately cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
details

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vito Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes Vito Transporter is moderately cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,460 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers significantly more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 406 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Kuga

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers barely more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers considerably more torque with 500 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is markedly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,916 kg. The difference is around 390 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries visibly more – 884 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 334 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,800
Vito Transporter

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 304 - 474 km
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Vito Transporter

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.

details

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption

Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
Electric Range
68 km
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 222 g/km
co2
55 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,882 mm
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
547 - 884 kg
Payload
541 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
Torque
240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.