Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (237 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (28,800 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Vito Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes Vito Transporter is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,646 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Transporter. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 126 km more than the Mercedes Vito Transporter.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 250 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is a bit lighter – 1,916 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries substantially more – 884 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 434 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes Vito Transporter
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.