Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
MG Cyberster vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (510 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (55,700 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Cyberster or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
MG Cyberster vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Cyberster
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is slightly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,277 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MG Cyberster is marginally more efficient: consuming 16.7 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a bit more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 93 km more than the MG Cyberster.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers marginally more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 3.8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers markedly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 725 Nm. That’s about 225 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Mustang Mach-E offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, MG Cyberster is somewhat lighter – 1,960 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 201 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more boot space – 519 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 319 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries significantly more – 450 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 300 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
MG Cyberster
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MG Cyberster
The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
MG Cyberster
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Roadster
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
200 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,913 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
150 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.