VS

MG MG3 vs Volvo V60 comparison

Compare performance (194 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Volvo V60?

MG MG3 vs Volvo V60: Key differences

MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MG3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG MG3 is significantly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36,000 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

V60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers clearly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 156 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers considerably more torque with 589 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 441 Nm more.

MG3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is substantially lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 497 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo V60 carries somewhat more – 506 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo V60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,400
V60

Volvo V60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 197 - 350 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2 - 6.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 99 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …
MG MG3
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG MG3

The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.

details
KV-1-1
Left-Back-30°-1
Front-Row-Space-1
Trunk-3

Reviews MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Giorgio catacchio
20 Sept 2025, 00:08:28

I've owned the MG3 Hybrid for a year — I travel a lot, never a dull moment; comes fully loaded as standard, incredible acceleration, etc.

Volvo V60

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior

Reviews Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Michael Hauser
2 Oct 2025, 08:00:10

I drive a V60 T6 TE e‑AWD Inscription MY 2022

Overall I'm very satisfied with it.

Positives +
+ Safety
+ Performance
+ Fuel consumption
+ Service and running costs
+ Driving feel (still has a bit of the Swedish tank about it)
+ Average consumption 5.2 l/100 km

Negatives -
- 180 km/h limiter, supposedly due to excessive centrifugal forces on the electric motor
- Thinner side windows than the predecessor
- Still very firm suspension
- 8‑speed automatic (feels like the car is always shifting)
- Volvo's own customer service has massively deteriorated in recent years (their new motto seems to be "take it or leave it")

As a long‑time Volvo customer, this will be my last Volvo — I'm not willing to go along with the (now purely electric and largely China‑produced) madness.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
Opel Corsa
VS
Choosing between the MG3 and the Opel Corsa means weighing a budget-friendly, quirky small hatch against a more refined, mainstream rival with stronger dealer support. Which suits you will come down to priorities like build quality, driving refinement, fuel economy and after-sales service.
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Citroen C3
MG MG3
VS
Comparing the Citroën C3 and the MG3 puts two budget-friendly city hatchbacks head-to-head: the C3 leans toward comfort, distinctive styling and a refined ride, while the MG3 focuses on low cost, generous interior space and straightforward practicality. If you value a plush, design-led small car go …
Hyundai i20
MG MG3
VS
The Hyundai i20 and the MG3 are compact hatchbacks aimed at budget-conscious buyers, but they take different approaches: the i20 focuses on refinement, safety and a more premium interior, while the MG3 prioritises bold styling and value-packed equipment. This comparison will help you decide which …
Mazda 2 Hybrid
MG MG3
VS
Choosing between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the MG3 means weighing a polished, fuel‑efficient small hatch against a budget‑friendly, spacious alternative. This short comparison focuses on fuel economy, interior quality, driving feel and ownership costs so you can decide which suits city commuting and …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Volvo V60
VS
In the competitive realm of premium wagons, the BMW 3 Series Touring and Volvo V60 both stand out for their distinctive blend of performance and practicality. The 3 Series Touring boasts BMW's dynamic handling and sporty aesthetics, appealing to those who crave an engaging driving experience. …
Ford Puma
MG MG3
VS
The Ford Puma and MG3 are popular compact cars aimed at buyers who want affordable, practical transport with low running costs. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how the Puma’s sharper driving dynamics and roomier interior stack up against the MG3’s strong equipment levels and …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
The MG3 and Clio are both small hatchbacks aimed at buyers wanting an affordable, city-friendly car, but they take different approaches to style, equipment and driving character. This comparison looks at where the MG3’s value-focused simplicity stacks up against the Clio’s sharper handling, nicer …
MG MG3
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
99 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
45 - 140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
373 - 448 kg
Payload
460 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
MG
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the MG MG3?

The MG MG3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.