Compare performance (231 HP vs 449 HP), boot space and price (32,600 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MGS5 EV or BYD Atto 3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the rising tides of electric automotive innovation, two contenders have emerged as strong competitors in the SUV category: the BYD Atto 3 and the MG MG5 EV. Both vehicles offer unique attributes, targeting modern drivers seeking efficiency, style, and advanced technology. Let's delve into their specifications and see which could be the right fit for you.
The BYD Atto 3 is powered by a robust 204 horsepower electric motor, delivering 150 kW and a torque of 310 Nm. This front-wheel drive SUV accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a swift 7.3 seconds, reaching a top speed of 160 km/h. It's designed to provide a smooth and swift driving experience with minimal energy consumption of 16 kWh per 100 km, and it offers an impressive electric range of 420 km.
Conversely, the MG MG5 EV offers versatility in its lineup with power output options ranging from 170 to 231 horsepower. The rear-wheel drive versions accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h within a band of 6.3 to 8 seconds, depending on the model, and can reach higher speeds of up to 190 km/h. While its consumption slightly varies between models, averaging around 16 kWh/100 km, it offers an electric range extending from 340 to an impressive 480 km, providing more flexibility for longer journeys.
In terms of dimensions, BYD Atto 3 is slightly more compact with a length of 4455 mm, a width of 1875 mm, and a height of 1615 mm. Its trunk capacity stands at 440 liters, making it practical for daily usage and moderate luggage needs. The total curb weight is calculated at 1825 kg, with a payload capacity of 335 kg.
Meanwhile, the MG MG5 EV is just a tad larger at 4476 mm in length, 1849 mm in width, and a height range between 1621 and 1633 mm, offering a bit more space for passengers. It boasts a trunk capacity of 453 liters and varies slightly in curb weight from 1710 kg to 1800 kg, depending on the variant chosen. Its payload capacity can go up to 395 kg, accommodating more substantial cargo.
Both models achieve a CO2 efficiency class of A, representing their commitment to eco-friendly technology. Notably, their zero g/km CO2 emissions underline their electric pedigree and dedication to sustainability.
The BYD Atto 3 features a seamless automatic transmission that supports a dynamic driving style. Meanwhile, the MG MG5 EV's automatic transmission is paired with a reduction gearbox, offering varied driving experiences depending on the model and enhancing efficiency and power management.
Deciding between these two competent electric SUVs ultimately comes down to personal preference and driving needs. The BYD Atto 3 stands out with its nimble drive, efficient consumption, and futuristic aesthetics, while the MG MG5 EV caters to those who value additional power options, range flexibility, and cargo space. As electric vehicles continue to evolve, both of these models showcase what the future of driving can bring to the table.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG MGS5 EV is very slightly cheaper – starting at 32,600 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 858 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MG MGS5 EV is barely more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 16 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 30 km more than the MG MGS5 EV.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers significantly more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 231 HP. That’s roughly 218 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the MG MGS5 EV takes 6.3 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers markedly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MGS5 EV is marginally lighter – 1,710 kg compared to 1,825 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MG MGS5 EV offers barely more boot space – 453 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 13 L.
When it comes to payload, the MG MGS5 EV carries a bit more – 395 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.
The BYD Atto 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG5 EV stands out as one of the few fully electric estate cars available in today's market. Known for its practicality, it offers ample space and a smooth driving experience, perfect for families looking to transition to an electric vehicle without compromising on roominess or comfort. Its sleek design and competitive pricing make it an attractive choice for eco-conscious drivers who value both style and sustainability.
details
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,600 - 38,600 £
|
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
340 - 480 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,710 - 1,800 kg
|
Curb weight
1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
453 L
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,455 mm
|
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,615 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
|
|
Payload
370 - 395 kg
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 231 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
125 - 170 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
BYD
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España