Compare performance (197 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 20,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Citroen C4?
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Citroen C4 and the MG ZS stand out as top contenders. Both vehicles bring a unique blend of style, performance, and innovation to the table, catering to different aspects of consumer preferences. Let's delve into the details and see how these two giants stack up against each other.
The Citroen C4 boasts modern aesthetics with a length of 4,350mm and a height of 1,525mm, which gives it a sleek, aerodynamic appeal. Its broader width of 1,834mm compared to the MG ZS's 1,818mm slightly enhances its presence on the road. The MG ZS, while slightly more compact with a length of 4,323mm and height of 1,649mm, compensates with a robust and muscular design that exudes confidence.
Citroen C4 is available with a variety of powertrains, including petrol, mild hybrid, and electric versions. The electric variant delivers up to 156 HP with a torque of 270 Nm, enabling a maximum speed of 150 km/h. The petrol engine versions, offering up to 131 HP, ensure a more responsive acceleration, reaching 0-100km/h in as fast as 8 seconds.
On the other hand, the MG ZS also embraces modern electric and hybrid solutions alongside traditional petrol engines. With the electric model reaching up to 197 HP and a torque of 280 Nm, it slightly edges out the C4 in power. This output helps propel the ZS from 0 to 100 km/h in 8.6 seconds, making it a competitive option for those seeking thrilling performance.
Both models cater to environmentally conscious drivers with their electric versions. The Citroen C4 electric variant offers a range of up to 427 km and an impressive consumption rate of about 14.5 kWh/100km. Meanwhile, the MG ZS holds its own with an electric range reaching 440 km, albeit with a slightly higher consumption at 17.3 kWh/100km.
Inside, both models offer ample seating for five passengers, designed for comfort and convenience. Citroen maximizes its versatility with a trunk capacity ranging up to 510 L, whereas the MG ZS offers a slightly lower capacity of 448 L but compensates with its smart use of interior space and advanced connectivity options.
Choosing between the Citroen C4 and the MG ZS depends greatly on what you value most in a vehicle. The Citroen C4 presents itself as a versatile option with a range of powertrains and commendable fuel economy, ideal for those who prioritize efficient urban commuting. In contrast, the MG ZS offers slightly more power and range, appealing to drivers seeking a blend of strong performance and spacious design.
Ultimately, both models showcase the innovation and evolution of the SUV market, and your choice will be largely influenced by specific needs and preferences. Whether it's the sleek elegance of the Citroen C4 or the robust practicality of the MG ZS, both vehicles represent excellence in the current automotive landscape.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS is moderately cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Citroen C4 costs 20,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C4 uses 4.7 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers noticeably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C4 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C4 delivers considerably more torque with 270 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 122 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is very slightly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,403 kg. The difference is around 73 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries a bit more – 470 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.
The Citroen C4 holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
Price
20,600 - 32,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,659 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,350 - 4,580 mm
|
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,520 - 1,525 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,250 - 1,360 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España