Compare performance (197 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Hyundai Kona?
The automotive market continues to evolve, offering a plethora of options for SUV enthusiasts. Two standout contenders are the Hyundai Kona and the MG ZS, each representing a unique blend of style, technology, and performance. As consumers look for vehicles that not only fit their lifestyle but also offer innovative features, we take a closer look at how these two models compare across various dimensions.
Both the Hyundai Kona and MG ZS showcase modern SUV aesthetics but appeal to different sensibilities. The Kona measures 4,350 mm in length, with a width of 1,825 mm and a height of 1,585 mm, while the ZS is slightly larger at 4,323 mm in length, up to 4,430 mm, with a width of 1,809 to 1,818 mm and a height of 1,649 mm. The compact design of the Kona is perfect for urban driving, whereas the slightly taller profile of the ZS provides additional cabin space and a commanding view of the road.
The Hyundai Kona offers versatility with a selection of petrol, full hybrid, and electric powertrains. It features power outputs ranging from 100 HP to 218 HP, catering to a wide array of performance preferences. The ZS, in contrast, primarily focuses on electric and hybrid variants, offering power outputs up to 197 HP. This makes the Kona a better choice for buyers looking for diverse powertrain options, while the ZS stands out in the electric segment.
When it comes to performance, the heat is on. The Kona can go from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.8 seconds, a figure that speaks to its sporty leanings, particularly with the higher power electric variants. The MG ZS performs well too, with a quick sprint of 8.6 seconds, reflecting its sporty character among compact SUVs. Both models boast impressive top speeds, with the Kona reaching up to 201 km/h, slightly eclipsing the ZS’s maximum speed of 175 km/h.
For eco-conscious buyers, fuel efficiency is key. The Kona excels in this area with petrol versions averaging between 5.7 to 6.7 L/100km, while the electric variants showcase a consumption of roughly 14.6 kWh/100km and an electric range of up to 514 km. The MG ZS presents a competitive offering with electric consumption figures around 17.3 kWh/100km and an electric range of 440 km, alongside hybrid options with slightly lower fuel consumption of around 5 to 5.1 L/100km.
Both vehicles seat five and come equipped with modern conveniences and technology to enhance the driving experience. The Hyundai Kona is known for its upscale interior quality, supported by a user-friendly infotainment system. In comparison, the MG ZS also offers a well-appointed interior but often emphasizes value over high-end materials. Both vehicles incorporate advanced safety features, accommodating tech-savvy consumers looking for connectivity and convenience.
The decision between the Hyundai Kona and MG ZS ultimately comes down to personal preferences regarding style, drivetrain choice, and technology. For those seeking a more dynamic driving experience with diverse powertrain options, the Kona holds a slight edge. On the other hand, the MG ZS makes a strong case with its competitive price point and solid electric offerings. Both models represent good value in today’s SUV landscape, catering to a range of needs and budgets.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS is markedly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,066 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers very slightly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers substantially more torque with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is very slightly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries only slightly more – 490 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The Hyundai Kona holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
|
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España