VS

MG ZS vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?

MG ZS vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG ZS is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,143 £.

Eclipse Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers only slightly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross delivers substantially more torque with 300 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 152 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is clearly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,922 kg. The difference is around 592 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers a bit more boot space – 545 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries somewhat more – 470 kg compared to 413 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 615 - 627 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG ZS
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.

details
mmd_22_ecpih_ext_komp_3_4_front_titan_weiss_dscf0844_low
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug in Hybrid 42_low
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug in Hybrid 30_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jose
11 Apr 2026, 22:56:06

More style and dynamics, a better warranty — and much more.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Toyota Yaris Cross present compelling choices for consumers seeking style and versatility. The MG ZS impresses with its value-for-money proposition, spacious interior, and bold design, while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a refined driving …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and MG ZS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Citroen C3 Aircross or …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Dacia Duster
MG ZS
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly SUVs, the Dacia Duster squares off against the MG ZS, each offering distinct charms. The Dacia Duster is renowned for its rugged durability and remarkable off-road capability, making it a favorite for those seeking adventure without breaking the bank. Meanwhile, the …
Ford Puma
MG ZS
VS
When comparing the Ford Puma and the MG ZS, it’s clear that both models appeal to different segments of the compact SUV market. The Ford Puma impresses with its sporty handling and innovative interior design, making it a favorite for those seeking a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
MG ZS
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
615 - 627 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,922 - 1,950 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
545 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,908 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
385 - 413 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
160 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MG
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.